· Public charity
Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc
Oregon Community Health Workers Association (ORCHWA) is the statewide professional association for community health workers (CHWs) in Oregon.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $1,640,836 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,059,135 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $418,299 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $111k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LATINO NETWORK | $603,375 |
| IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE COMM | $560,959 |
| THE URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND | $355,442 |
| FUTURE GENERATIONS COLLAB | $111,060 |
| ASIAN HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +169% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Latino Network4× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +169%
THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION4× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +119%
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC4× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +396%
Funded once
- OHOREGON HEALTH EQUITY ALLIANCEone grant, 2024 · $569k
- IHINDIGENOUS HEALTH EQUITY INSTone grant, 2024 · $382k
- MIMICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITYone grant, 2020 · $112k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.
Our mission is to improve and strengthen the mental health and emotional wellbeing of the latine community through culturally-grounded, evidence-based practices, interventions, education and capacity building activities.
To advance the wellness and leadership capacity of Latino populations.
Oregon latino health coalition advances the health of latinos through policy, advocacy, and prevention.
Empowermentwe promote practices that lead to health and well-being, we affirm cultural and social diversity, and we advocate for leadership grounded in solidarity. (continued on schedule o)educationquality education is a fundamental right…
To support the lives of latinx and immigrant community members by creating a safe space that fosters leadership, education, wellness, and connection.
To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.
Centro's mission is to provide culturally competent support services to families in a holistic approach in order to improve their quality of life.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Columbia river health exists to provide exceptional healthcare for everyone in our community.
Alas is primary to provide social wellness through multicultural practices, mental health care, individualized and collective support related to education, immigration process, and social services to latino families in half moon bay and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Network and the most unlike its peers is Micronesian Islander Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HOLISTIC HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Familias en Accion ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Legacy Health · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Seeding Justice · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Careoregon Inc · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- African Family Holistic Health Organization — 76% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Micronesian Islander Community — 25% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc?
Find your warmest path to Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.