Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oreck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$789kPhilanthropy$170kEducation$60kHealth$59kReligion$26kAnimals$24kRecreation & Sports$20kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Corning Museum of Glass$60,000
Northwell Health Foundation$50,000
Denver Museum of Nature and Science$20,000
USA Weightlifting Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%BARK AVENUE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Northwell Health Foundation: $50k → 6%The Corning Museum of Glass: $100k → 13%Albright-Knox Art Gallery: $15k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA GLASS CENTER: $50k → 12%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 7%USA Weightlifting Foundation: $10k → 9%DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $66k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $50k → 15%NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $108k → 23%MAYO FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%BARK AVENUE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%The Corning Museum of Glass: $60k → 13%CAROLINA DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 12%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 7%USA Weightlifting Foundation: $10k → 9%Denver Museum of Nature and Science: $50k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $35k → 15%NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $100k → 23%MAYO FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%BARK AVENUE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $6k → 12%Denver Museum of Nature and Science: $20k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $35k → 15%THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $55k → 23%MAYO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%BARK AVENUE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $25k → 15%THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $55k → 23%MAYO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%BARK: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $25k → 15%THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $15k → 23%MAYO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM: $15k → 23%WYES-TV: $25k → 23%WYES-TV: $25k → 23%WYES-TV: $3k → 23%WYES-TV: $3k → 23%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 23%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 23%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 23%TOURO SYNAGOUGE: $3k → 23%TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 23%TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 23%AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE: $3k → 23%AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE: $3k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
RI
CA
CO
NC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$849k · 15 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$849k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+27%

Still filing today

47%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $160k · revenue +23%
  • CM
    Colorado Museum of Natural History
    3× · 2023–2025 · $136k · revenue +3%
  • BF
    BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $14k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AG
    Asheville Glass Art School
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -13%
  • BF
    BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +35%
  • CD
    Carolina Day School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
5
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
6
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
7
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
8
American Airpower Museum Co Cockpit Cpt Usa Llc
9
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
10
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
11
Berggruen Institute
Education
12
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Corning Museum of Glass and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM — $207,500 · OtherNATIONAL WWII MUSEUMTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS — $160,000 · OtherTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASSIndividual grant recipient — $62,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAYO FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $20,250 · OtherUSA Weightlifting Foundation — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $27,128 · OtherTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $139,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MU…Colorado Museum of Natural History — $135,728 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Natural H…BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $800 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS — $170,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…Asheville Glass Art School — $50,000 · EducationCarolina Day School Inc — $10,000 · EducationNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthTOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION — $8,500 · HealthBETTERTOGETHER FOREVER — $13,500 · AnimalsAudubon Nature Institute Inc — $10,000 · Animals
Other$547,378Arts & Culture$290,528Philanthropy$170,000Education$60,000Health$58,500Animals$23,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS — $170,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS — $160,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $139,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History — $135,728 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAsheville Glass Art School — $50,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETTERTOGETHER FOREVER — $13,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAudubon Nature Institute Inc — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCarolina Day School Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS
  • Who funds THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Asheville Glass Art School
  • Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY
  • Who funds BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER
  • Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc
  • Who funds Carolina Day School Inc
  • Who funds TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oreck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph