· Private foundation
Orchard Charities
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $475k
- $250k+1 grant · $280k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UVU FOUNDATION | $280,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200,000 |
| STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| HALE CENTER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HOPE 4 OREM | $50,000 |
| BRIDLE UP HOPE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| NOW I CAN FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MENTORS INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| FIGHT AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RUN ELITE PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| LIVE YOUR DREAM FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Orchard Charities’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in UT; read by stated purpose it is 76% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $741k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SWStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love2× · 2022–2023 · $181k · revenue +56%
- HCHALE CENTER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND EDUCATION2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +48%
- NINOW I CAN FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- MBMAMA BABY INTERNATIONALone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -40%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $50k
- USUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of zeelo is to serve, encourage, connect, shepherd and resource global leaders around the world, focusing on those who live and minister among remote people groups.
Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.
Driven by our Christian faith, HopeCo provides quality holistic care that enables vulnerable children, their families, and communities in East Africa to flourish.
We train organizations around the world to raise up thriving businesses in undeserved communities.
Girl Up Initiative UgandaS mission is to build a vibrant movement of girls and young women through transformative leadership, sexual and reproductive health education, and skills development. The US organizations primary purpose is to…
Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.
Maternal Health Foundation is dedicated to treatment and prevention of childbirth injuries by building sustainable capacity with local partners in Sub-Saharan Africa supporting world-renowned doctors, researchers and hospitals that treat…
Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.
Humanity & Hope United is a non-profit working to assist underserved villages in remote parts of Honduras. We partner with the people of each village to achieve sustainable change, focusing on the needs of individuals rather than a single…
URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…
The Transatlantic Orthopedic Foundation participates with medical practitioners, businesses, governmental, and non-governmental organizations to provide humanitarian assistance for individuals addressing musculoskeletal conditions in…
MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stella H Oaks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Run Elite Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Stand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love ↗
- Who funds STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HALE CENTER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MAMA BABY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NOW I CAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CUMORAH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds The Rachel Covey Foundation ↗
- Who funds Mentors International ↗
- Who funds HIKI OLA ↗
- Who funds Sego Lily Foundation dba Zimbabwe Blooms ↗
- Who funds EQUINE CHARITIES - MAPLETON ↗
- Who funds Warrior Rising ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND EARLY LEARNING PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds RUN ELITE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SOUTHLAND ELEMENTARY PTO ↗
- Who funds CharityVision International ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: University Impact · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Bertin Family Foundation · Community Trust of Utah · Beesley Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Orchard Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Orchard Charities?
Find your warmest path to Orchard Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.