Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Oral Roberts University

To develop holy spirit-empowered leaders through whole person education to impact the world.

$62M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$383kCommunity Improvement$283kPublic Safety & Disaster$52kInternational$16kHuman Services$15kRecreation & Sports$15k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $159,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $62,081,042 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,921,542 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$49,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$323M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NETWORK211$65,000
TULSA METRO CHAMBER$49,500
LAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION$25,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary: $50k → 10%THE A21 CAMPAIGN: $75k → 10%LA DREAM CENTER: $7k → 14%TULSA METRO CHAMBER: $50k → 15%Reggie Dabbs Motivational: $8k → 11%LAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION: $25k → 13%Carl Richardson Ministries Inc: $10k → 13%THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $88k → 15%THE A21 CAMPAIGN: $10k → 10%TULSA METRO CHAMBER: $43k → 15%Lausanne Committee for World Evangelism: $10k → 13%NETWORK211: $65k → 15%THE A21 CAMPAIGN: $10k → 10%TULSA METRO CHAMBER: $36k → 15%NETWORK211: $50k → 15%Tulsa Metro Chamber: $35k → 15%Convoy of Hope: $22k → 15%Tulsa Metro Chamber: $35k → 15%CONVOY OF HOPE: $20k → 15%Tulsa Metro Chamber: $30k → 15%CONVOY OF HOPE: $10k → 15%Tulsa Metro Chamber: $26k → 15%CONVOY OF HOPE: $6k → 15%TULSA'S FUTURE INC: $20k → 15%TULSA METRO CHAMBER: $8k → 15%ORU Rugby Club: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Oral Roberts University’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Oral Roberts Universitylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$498k · 4 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$498k
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE)
    8× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +96%
  • N2
    NETWORK 211 INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $115k · revenue 0%
  • T
    TheSend
    2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue -45%

Funded once

  • PP
    POTOMAC PARK CAMP GROUNDS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $88k · revenue +4%
  • GT
    Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
4
Lou Engle Ministries

Advancing the kingdom of god through prayer,preaching and teaching.

Religion
5
For His Glory Ministries

For his glory's mission is to launch disciple-making movements that transform nations for christ.

Religion
6
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
7
Forum of Christian Leaders

The Forum of Christian Leaders (FOCL) exists to unite, equip, and resource global evangelical leaders toward the end of world evangelism and the renewal of the Biblical church.

Religion
8
Torch of Christ Ministries

Torch of Christ Ministries provides evangelism, education, and missional support through the dissemination of information with the primary intent of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to all.

Religion
9
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
10
Convention of Full Gospel Churches

The Convention of Full Gospel Churches exists to be a Holy Spirit-empowered, Christ-centered fellowship of churches, faithfully proclaiming the Word of God, ministering in the power of the Holy Spirit, equipping the saints for service, and…

Religion
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Tulsas Future. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) — $262,550 · OtherTULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF C…POTOMAC PARK CAMP GROUNDS INC — $88,000 · OtherPOTOMAC PARK CAMP GROUNDS INCORU Rugby Club — $15,000 · Other+4 more — $35,444 · Other+4 moreNETWORK 211 INC — $115,000 · ReligionNETWORK 211 INCTheSend — $85,000 · ReligionTheSendLAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION — $35,000 · ReligionLAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANG…CONVOY OF HOPE — $57,923 · InternationalGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc — $50,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$400,994Religion$235,000International$57,923Education$50,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) — $262,550 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNETWORK 211 INC — $115,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetPOTOMAC PARK CAMP GROUNDS INC — $88,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTheSend — $85,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $57,923 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oral Roberts University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph