Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Oracle Health Foundation

To build healthier tomorrows and stronger communities around the world.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$257k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$14MReligion$1.8MEducation$352kHealth$312kHuman Services$295kPublic Benefit$281kCommunity Improvement$85kFood & Nutrition$41kAnimals$20kOther$4.4M
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $257,114 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,189,119 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $932,005 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$257,114
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHE KIDS INSTITUTE$257,114
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMON SPIRIT FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%AVENUE OF LIFE: $15k → 16%LEAD TO READ KC: $6k → 8%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER: $8k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER: $7k → 15%HOPE HOUSE INC: $7k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $17k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $577k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$164k · 29% · 66 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Sub-Saharan Africa$141k · 25% · 47 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Central America and the Caribbean$125k · 22% · 59 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

South America$61k · 11% · 26 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$51k · 9% · 17 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Middle East and North Africa$23k · 4% · 7 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

South Asia$11k · 2% · 2 people

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 32 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
59

Total granted

$4.3M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+5%

Still filing today

44%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $276k · revenue +15%
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +39%
  • NC
    NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM
    2× · 2022–2023 · $85k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • CC
    CERNER CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $330k
  • MF
    MILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +26%
  • WW
    WELCOME WELLNESS HEALTH ED RESOURCE CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

2
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
3
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
4
Manhattan Community Health Foundation

To promote health in the manhattan, kansas community and the surrounding areas in a manner not inconsistent with the mission of via christi hospital of manhattan, kansas bydeveloping and maintaining initiatives in private fundraising,…

Philanthropy
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

7
Commonspirit Health Foundation

Commonspirit health foundation serves to operate in conformity with the mission, vision, and values of commonspirit health and to participate in collaborative efforts to enhance and improve the fundraising and grant-making efforts of all…

Religion
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

9
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Foundation of Northeast Kansas Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Patterson Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringCancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr17%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr17%86%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr17%3%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/108
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,054

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/73
Grantees still filing
43/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $12,311,449 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $547,307 · Philanthropy+12 more — $1,107,227 · Philanthropy+12 moreHEALTHE KIDS INSTITUTE — $2,996,751 · OtherHEALTHE KIDS INSTITUTECERNER CORPORATION — $329,604 · OtherCERNER CORPORATION+55 more — $1,246,006 · Other+55 moreServant Foundation — $964,924 · ReligionServant F…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $775,888 · ReligionCATHOLIC …+1 more — $33,500 · ReligionNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM — $85,000 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL PREPARATION - KANSAS CITY INC — $72,935 · EducationNORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC — $55,832 · EducationDonnelly College — $55,000 · EducationGREAT JOBS KC INC — $27,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE — $22,200 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $17,100 · Education+2 more — $16,800 · EducationWELCOME WELLNESS HEALTH ED RESOURCE CTR — $100,000 · HealthMemorial Hermann Foundation — $47,500 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $25,750 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $21,500 · HealthBanner Health Foundation — $20,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc — $16,453 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,550 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $10,500 · Health+8 more — $59,547 · HealthMILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON SPIRIT — $35,000 · Human ServicesRECONCILIATION SERVICES — $16,800 · Human ServicesBishop Sullivan Center Inc — $15,200 · Human ServicesAVENUE OF LIFE INC — $15,000 · Human Services+2 more — $12,800 · Human ServicesCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $275,500 · Public Benefit+1 more — $5,750 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$13,965,983Other$4,572,361Religion$1,774,312Education$351,867Health$311,800Human Services$294,800Public Benefit$281,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $12,311,449 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHE KIDS INSTITUTE — $2,996,751 over 5y, 62% of budgetServant Foundation — $964,924 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $775,888 over 1y, 38% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $547,307 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $300,476 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $275,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $205,239 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY ADVISORY NETWORK INC — $200,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCHARITYVEST INC — $193,569 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetORACLE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $124,577 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWELCOME WELLNESS HEALTH ED RESOURCE CTR — $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $85,199 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM — $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL PREPARATION - KANSAS CITY INC — $72,935 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $64,707 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetT ROWE PRICE PROGRAM FOR CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $62,805 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC — $55,832 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDonnelly College — $55,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $50,298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $50,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation — $47,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKANBE'S MARKETS — $34,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Christian Concern Inc — $33,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT JOBS KC INC — $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $25,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC — $25,251 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE — $22,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $21,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $18,388 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $17,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILIATION SERVICES — $16,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc — $16,453 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $15,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBishop Sullivan Center Inc — $15,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAVENUE OF LIFE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $13,544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PATTERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $13,348 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC — $11,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Guidance — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO55.5× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Servant Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Greater Horizons · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Giving the Basics Inc · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Bluescope Foundation North America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oracle Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oracle Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Oracle Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph