Skip to content

· Private foundation

Opera House Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$726k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$290k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.6MCommunity Improvement$1.2MEducation$286kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $310k
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$33,076
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY$290,000
LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION$91,678
UK OPERA THEATRE$91,601
FRIENDS OF THE ARTS SCHOOL (SCAPA)$66,277
LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY$60,000
LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE$39,850
KENTUCKY BALLET THEATRE$33,076
BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET$16,817
Individual grant recipient$13,091
CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$7,982
THE LEXINGTON SINGERS$7,490
CENTRAL KENTUCKY CONCERT BAND$4,020
Individual grant recipient$3,924
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LEXINGTON THEATRE CO: $60k → 8%KENTUCKY BALLET THEATRE: $60k → 15%KENTUCKY BALLET THEATRE: $39k → 15%KENTUCKY BALLET THEATRE: $33k → 15%KENTUCKY BALLET THEATRE: $23k → 15%LFUCG PARKS & RECREATION: $14k → 15%LFUCG PARKS & RECREATION: $14k → 15%LFUCG PARKS & RECREATION: $13k → 15%LFUCG PARKS & RECREATION: $13k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $28k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $17k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $17k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $16k → 15%THE KENTUCKIANS CHORUS: $4k → 15%THE KENTUCKIANS CHORUS: $4k → 15%THE KENTUCKIANS CHORUS: $4k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $14k → 15%BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET: $3k → 15%UK OPERA THEATRE: $92k → 15%UK OPERA THEATRE: $90k → 15%UK OPERA THEATRE: $90k → 15%UK OPERA THEATRE: $45k → 15%CENTRAL KENTUCKY CONCERT BAND: $4k → 15%CENTRAL KENTUCKY CONCERT BAND: $3k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $381k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $244k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $214k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $204k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $92k → 15%LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $69k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $60k → 15%LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $55k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $50k → 15%LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $42k → 15%LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $41k → 15%LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $40k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $34k → 15%LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $32k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $23k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $15k → 15%LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY: $12k → 15%LEXINGTON PHILHARMONIC: $9k → 15%THE LEXINGTON SINGERS: $7k → 15%LEXINGTON PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY: $7k → 15%THE LEXINGTON SINGERS: $7k → 15%THE LEXINGTON SINGERS: $6k → 15%REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $9k → 15%THE LEXINGTON SINGERS: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 14 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$3.1M
$69k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +132%
  • LT
    LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $432k · revenue +365%
  • LC
    LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • LT
    LEXINGTON THEATRE CO
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • RT
    REPERTORY THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lafayette Ballet Theatre

The mission of lafayette ballet theatre is to provide artistic dance education and cultural programs in the community. lafayette ballet theatre encourages and stimulates development of the performing arts through the offering of…

—
2
Rocky Mountain Ballet Theatre
Arts & Culture
3
Studio Players Inc

Studio Players Inc. is a non-profit community theatre in Lexington KY. Incorporated in 1952 the organizations mission is to provide the greater Lexington KY area with a wide array of live theatre production that will be enjoyed by a wide…

—
4
Friends of Kentucky Theatre

The Kentucky Theatre is a historic building in downtown Lexington, KY, that had fallen into disuse and disrepair. Purchased by the City of Lexington, The Friends of the Kentucky Theatre Inc is a nonprofit tasked with overseeing the…

Philanthropy
5
Lyric Stage Company of Boston Inc

Theatrical stage performances.

Arts & Culture
6
Franklin Light Opera
—
7
Lexington Retirement Corporation
Human Services
8
Lexington Philharmonic Orchestra Foundation Inc

To secure long term financial support through public and private sources and to promote philanthropic activities to benefit the foundation's endowment to support the lexington philharmonic society, inc.

Arts & Culture
9
Latin Ballet of Virginia

To preserve and promote the Latin American and Spanish cultures by performing for diverse audiences for charitable and educational purposes. The company provides professional training to its dancers and students and enhances the community…

Arts & Culture
10
Lexington County Arts Association

The associations purpose is to give the community an opportunity to participate in theatrical productions and expose the community to cultural events

Arts & Culture
11
Chamber Music Festival of Lexingtoninc

The organization operates a 10-day festival and year round concerts in Lexington, Ky. It is the mission of the Chamber Music Festival of Lexington to present innovative, accessible, and inclusive chamber music performances of the highest…

Arts & Culture
12
Lynchburg Symphony Orchestra Inc

The organizations mission is to enrich lives and connect the community through opportunities to experience beautiful and high-quality symphonic music with a vision that the organization is a vibrant and integral leader of the Lynchburg,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexington Children's Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lexington Singers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $1,203,728 · Community ImprovementLEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATIONUK OPERA THEATRE: $354,380 · OtherUK OPERA THEATREFRIENDS OF THE ARTS SCHOOL (SCAPA): $286,345 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ARTS SCHOOL (SCAPA)LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY INC: $194,237 · OtherLEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY INCLEXINGTON THEATRE CO: $60,000 · OtherLEXINGTON THEATRE COIndividual grant recipient: $53,787 · OtherKENTUCKY CHINESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC: $48,153 · Other+5 more: $75,842 · Other+5 moreLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY: $431,579 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANYLEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $209,728 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INCBallet Theatre of Lexington Inc: $154,552 · Arts & CultureBallet Theatre of Lexington IncBLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET INC: $95,107 · Arts & CultureBLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET INC+1 more: $15,313 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$1,203,728Other$1,072,744Arts & Culture$906,279

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION: $1,203,728 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY: $431,579 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetLEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $209,728 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetLEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY INC: $194,237 over 6y, 16% of budgetBallet Theatre of Lexington Inc: $154,552 over 4y, 13% of budgetBLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET INC: $95,107 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetLEXINGTON SINGERS: $31,698 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLEXINGTON PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $15,313 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ballet Theatre of Lexington Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLUEGRASS YOUTH BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON SINGERS ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lexarts IncKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lexarts Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Opera House Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Opera House Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Opera House Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Opera House Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Opera House’s filings →

    More from the funding graph