Skip to content

· Private foundation

Open Meadows Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$95kEnvironment$50kEmployment$25kCommunity Improvement$9kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$4kCivil Rights$4kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS EARTH AND CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK$50,000
ELSIE PUBLISHING INSTITUTE$25,000
EXPERIMENTAL THEATRE PROJECT INC$25,000
PAI FOUNDATION$10,000
LESBIAN HERSTORY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GALS GUIDE TO THE GALAXY: $2k → 5%BUTTERFLY DREAMZ INC: $2k → 16%TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
NM
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Moonshot Initiative Inc

Promote gender equity in the film & television industry

Arts & Culture
2
Womanshare Legacy

Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…

Human Services
3
Ladies Who Launch Inc
Education
4
Womens March Inc

Women's March is committed to dismantling systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures guided by self-determination, dignity and respect.

—
5
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
6
Woca Inc

WOCA, Inc. is a national grassroots service organization dedicated to creating racial and cultural equity in the arts sector by promoting opportunities for arts leaders and providing a platform to help amplify the voice and visibility of…

Human Services
7
Ghana Girls Connect

Ghana Girls Connect, Inc. exists to empower young women of the diaspora to pursue their creative passions and turn them into sustainable professional careers. Through cultural immersion, professional development, and women empowerment…

Public Benefit
8
Hawaii Women in Filmmaking

Educate and encourage women and girls to tell stories and express themselves through film.

Arts & Culture
9
Make Art With Purpose Incorporated

Make Art with Purpose produces collaborative arts and arts education programs that are free and open to the public. We work in partnership with universities and schools, museums, government agencies and other non-profit organizations.

Arts & Culture
10
Roadwork Center for Cultures in Disputed Territories

Founded in 1978 by women leaders from african american civil rights, womens, global justice, and lesbian-feminist movements, roadwork aims at transforming consciousness and creating new movements in global arts and social justice.

Arts & Culture
11
Firefly Arts Collective Inc

Organize & hold interactive, participatory events

Arts & Culture
12
WOR2WOW Productions

Help women catalyze change for a better world through the arts, research and civic engagement - a stage production telling the stories of women WWII heroes.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women Make Movies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Butterfly Dreamz Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EXPERIMENTAL THEATRE PROJECT INC: $25,000 · OtherEXPERIMENTAL THEATRE PROJECT INC2 LEAF PRESS INC: $7,000 · Other2 LEAF PRESS INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQWOC MAP: $5,000 · OtherQWOC MAPIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+14 more: $27,250 · Other+14 moreWomen's Earth and Climate Action Network: $50,000 · Science & TechWomen's Earth and Climate Act…Elsie Publishing Institute: $25,000 · Arts & CultureElsie Publishing InstitutePAI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePAI FOUNDATIONCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE …WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLESBIAN HERSTORY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsTLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,000 · Human ServicesButterfly Dreamz Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesGALS GUIDE TO THE GALAXY: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$79,250Science & Tech$50,000Arts & Culture$49,000Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomen's Earth and Climate Action Network: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetElsie Publishing Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLESBIAN HERSTORY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPAI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButterfly Dreamz Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Women's Earth and Climate Action Network ↗
  • Who funds Elsie Publishing Institute ↗
  • Who funds LESBIAN HERSTORY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Butterfly Dreamz Inc ↗
  • Who funds CREATE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GALS GUIDE TO THE GALAXY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Open Meadows Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Open Meadows Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Open Meadows Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Open Meadows Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Open Meadows’ filings →

    More from the funding graph