Skip to content

· Private foundation

Onward Path Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$88kEducation$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$23kReligion$18kInternational$12kAnimals$8kHealth$5kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$125k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
R Pequignot$5,000
TAYLOR UNIVERSITY BROADCASTING INC$5,000
KINGS GLOBAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 6 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$85k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    Taylor University Broadcasting Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +32%
  • NC
    NOBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -2%
  • DS
    D Sullenbarger
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • JL
    J Luh
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
2
Compassion Ministries
Religion
3
Keith Wheeler Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
4
Across Nations

Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.

Religion
5
Wayne Dorsett Ministries Inc

To reach lost people with the transforming Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
6
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
7
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
8
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
9
Twelve Stones Ministries Inc

Helping the most hurting through Gospel centered counseling; while inviting and equipping their community to engage with grace and truth.

Religion
10
Crosscounsel International Ministries Inc

The mission of crosscounsel international ministries, inc is to help people move toward emotional, spiritual, and physical health through the healing power of jesus the christ.

Religion
11
Fisherman for Life Ministers Inc

Minister

Education
12
Tyndale House Ministries

Minister to the spiritual needs of people, primarily through the publication of literature consistent with biblical principles and through grants to other charitable entities.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Church Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Newnan Coweta Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

L King: $11,500 · OtherL KingHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCHNOBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $10,000 · OtherNOBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INCD Sullenbarger: $6,500 · OtherD SullenbargerJ Luh: $6,500 · OtherJ LuhS Barr: $5,700 · OtherJ Scott: $5,000 · OtherR Pequignot: $5,000 · OtherC Baker: $5,000 · OtherM Fritz: $5,000 · OtherD Meadows: $5,000 · OtherJ Goldey: $5,000 · OtherS Garner: $5,000 · OtherE Lucas: $5,000 · OtherE Shick: $5,000 · OtherJ Stacy: $5,000 · OtherL Bleke: $5,000 · OtherKINGS GLOBAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $9,780 · Other+5 moreTaylor University Broadcasting Inc: $40,000 · EducationTaylor University Broad…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,000 · ReligionALLEN COUNTY JAIL CHAPLAINCY: $2,500 · ReligionNEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,500 · AnimalsWOMENS CARE CENTER-NORTHEAST INDIANA: $5,000 · HealthLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $5,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalCompassion International Incorporated: $4,500 · International
Other$119,980Education$40,000Religion$9,500Animals$7,500Health$5,000Human Services$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000International$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTaylor University Broadcasting Inc: $40,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNOBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS CARE CENTER-NORTHEAST INDIANA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEN COUNTY JAIL CHAPLAINCY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Taylor University Broadcasting Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CARE CENTER-NORTHEAST INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN COUNTY JAIL CHAPLAINCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Onward Path Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Onward Path Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Onward Path Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Onward Path Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Onward Path’s filings →

    More from the funding graph