Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oneill Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$532kReligion$361kHuman Services$295kArts & Culture$100kHealth$75kRecreation & Sports$45kYouth Development$30kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURLINGTON LIBRARY FDN$55,000
EAGLES NEST PRJECT WISCONSIN$15,000
BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC$10,000
BURLINGTON LITTLE LEAGUE$10,000
AGAPE RANCH$10,000
ST CHARLES CHURCH$5,500
MORGAN'S CARING CONNECTION$2,000
BURLINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION COR$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MORGAN'S CARING CONNECTION: $2k → 10%MOBILITY TRAINING AND INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM: $3k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $35k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $35k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $35k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $35k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $25k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $25k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $25k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $25k → 10%AGAPE HOUSE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 24 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+10%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AGAPE HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +121%
  • WH
    WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $75k · revenue +241%
  • BA
    BURLINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CI
    CURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2022 · $175k
  • MG
    MITCHELL GALARY OF FLIGHT
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FAMILY UW CHLDREN'S HOSPITAL & STEVE STRICKER AM FAM INS FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
2
The Madison Waldorf School Ltd

The madison waldorf school is an independent day school located in madison wisconsin, and a developing member of the association of waldorf schools of north america.

Education
3
Wels Lutherans for Life Metro Milwaukee Inc

Protecting a child's right to live and be loved by loving moms and dads.

Civil Rights
4
Wisconsin Library Services Inc

Providing services to members in a fee-for-service model to help advance library services, primarily in the state of wisconsin.

—
5
Wisconsin American Legion Auxiliary Badger Girls State Inc

To teach government and to promote leadership

Education
6
Wisconsin Lions Birch-Sturm Memorial Fund Inc

To provide financial support from time to time to further certain of the exempt purposes of the wisconsin lions foundation, inc.

Human Services
7
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
8
Wisconsin Principles Inc

Wisconsin principles (wp) is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization dedicated to preserving conservative values in the state of wisconsin. committed to fiscal conservatism, educational choice, and individual liberty, we strive to empower…

Civil Rights
9
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
10
Lutheran Counseling and Family Services

Lutheran counseling and family services of wisconsin provides faith-based mental health counseling, family life education and adoption services.

Human Services
11
Milwaukee Bucks Foundation Inc

Improve the quality of life for youth and families in wisconsin focusing on youth education, health, wellness and community betterment

Human Services
12
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Next Door Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC: $350,942 · OtherBURLINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOL INCST CHARLES CHURCH: $183,537 · OtherST CHARLES CHURCHCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $175,000 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEETRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $40,000 · Other+32 more: $256,560 · Other+32 moreAGAPE HOUSE INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOUSE INC+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesBURLINGTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · EducationEAGLES NEST PROJECTS WISCONSIN: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,250 · EducationWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $100 · Recreation & SportsAGAPE RANCH INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $800 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE CHOICES INC: $8,000 · HealthOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $1,500 · HealthNEW DAY WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $1,000 · HealthSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,006,039Human Services$254,500Education$88,250Arts & Culture$75,000Recreation & Sports$12,600Youth Development$10,800Health$10,500Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAPE HOUSE INC: $250,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHOICES INC: $8,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetCARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOBILITY TRAINING AND INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMORGANS CARING CONNECTION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DAY WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBURLINGTON COMMUNITY POOL CORP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGAPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES NEST PROJECTS WISCONSIN ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds STARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Bong Naturalist Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOBILITY TRAINING AND INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI17.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Kunes Family Foundation · The Wagner Foundation Ltd · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Wagner-Essman Care Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oneill Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oneill Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oneill Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Oneill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oneill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph