Skip to content
One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660 at a glance

· Private foundation

One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$205kCommunity Improvement$100kHuman Services$71kHousing & Shelter$60kYouth Development$42kRecreation & Sports$33kFood & Nutrition$28kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY$23,500
HOWARD CENTER$19,000
MERCY CONNECTIONS$15,000
OUTRIGHT VERMONT$12,000
COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND$10,000
JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM$7,500
TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY$7,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY$5,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF ADDISON COUNTY$5,000
LAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMITTEE INC$4,000
ONE GOOD DEED FUND$3,500
PRIDE CENTER OF VERMONT INC$1,500
WOOD4GOOD LTD$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $20k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $20k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $19k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $15k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $11k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $10k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $10k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $9k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $9k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $8k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $8k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $5k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $3k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $3k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $2k → 10%PRIDE CENTER OF VERMONT INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$548k · 12 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +70% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$548k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+70%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $96k · revenue +94%
  • HI
    HowardCenter Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +52%
  • JM
    Janet Munt Family Room
    7× · 2018–2025 · $66k · revenue +326%

Funded once

  • BC
    BURLINGTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SY
    SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +70%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR A RESILIENT MONTPELIER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
2
Vermont Center for Family Studies

Our mission is to strengthen families and communities by improving human relationships. We do this through the training of expert family therapists, advisors, leaders, and family members in Bowen Family Systems Theory.

Human Services
3
Vermont Psychological Services Former Behavior Therapy & Psychotherapy

Provide psychology & counseling to members of society who display behavior & psychological problems.

Health
4
Chittenden Community Television

To be a trusted source of community based channels, tools and training that helps citizens and organizations expand their reach and impact.

Arts & Culture
5
Rutland County Pride

Rutland County Pride educates, advocates and celebrates with and for the LGBTQIA2S+ Vermonters and allies.

Civil Rights
6
Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield Vt Inc

Providing a drop in center, meeting facilities, and transitional housing for those in need of help with addiction. Also provide recovery coaching on site and on call.

Health
7
Rutland County Parent Child Center Inc

The Center is a resource for family growth and development in Rutland County, Vermont.

Human Services
8
Vermont Cares

To provide life-saving harm reduction services, education, and resources to vermonters affected by hiv, hepatitis c, and substance use by increasing access to care, reducing social stigmas, and building relationships.

Health
9
Community Justice Network of Vermont

The community justice network of vermont unites the efforts of vermonters seeking to make restorative responses available for people whose lives are

—
10
Vermont Parent Child Center Network

Vermont Parent Child Center Network is designed to assist the 15 Parent Child Centers located in Vermont by providing support and services to families they serve.

Human Services
11
Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform

Education of the public about the criminal justice system. Direct services to people struggling with substance use disorder, including case managment and recovery support.

Crime & Legal
12
Aids Project of Southern Vermont

Provide direct services to those whose lives are affected by hiv/aids, offer education & supplies to prevent its spread and promote understanding in the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc; the most unlike its peers is WOOD4GOOD Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HowardCenter Inc: $91,344 · Human ServicesHowardCenter IncJanet Munt Family Room: $66,000 · Human ServicesJanet Munt Family Room+2 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesMERCY CONNECTIONS: $70,000 · OtherMERCY CONNECTIONSCHITTENDEN EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF: $27,594 · OtherCHITTENDEN EMERGENCY FOOD S…ONE GOOD DEED FUND: $13,500 · OtherONE GOOD DEED FUNDBURLINGTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $5,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $12,226 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDE…FOUNDATION FOR A RESILIENT MONTPELIER INC: $4,973 · Other+1 more: $4,000 · OtherCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $95,500 · Community ImprovementCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OF…COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $58,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMITTEE O…+1 more: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterOUTRIGHT VERMONT: $41,500 · Public Safety & DisasterPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $20,000 · HealthCommunity Health Services of Addison Cty Inc: $19,000 · HealthTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC: $33,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$163,844Other$137,293Community Improvement$95,500Housing & Shelter$59,500Public Safety & Disaster$41,500Health$39,000Recreation & Sports$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $95,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHowardCenter Inc: $91,344 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJanet Munt Family Room: $66,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOUTRIGHT VERMONT: $41,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Services of Addison Cty Inc: $19,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY: $12,226 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A RESILIENT MONTPELIER INC: $4,973 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMITTEE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOOD4GOOD LTD: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPride Center of Vermont Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…United Way of Northwe…National Life Group C…Community Bank Na Fou…The University of Ver…Seventh Generation Fo…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…Fanny Allen Corporati…Antonio B and Rita M …Hoehl Family Foundati…The Richard M Schulze…The Pfizer Foundation…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · The University of Vermont Medical Center · Seventh Generation Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Fanny Allen Corporation · Antonio B and Rita M Pomerleau Foundation Inc · Hoehl Family Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Janet Munt Family Room: 44% of income from government
  • Pride Center of Vermont Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Outright Vermont: 13% of income from government
  • HowardCenter Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660?

Find your warmest path to One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home