· Private foundation
One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY | $23,500 |
| HOWARD CENTER | $19,000 |
| MERCY CONNECTIONS | $15,000 |
| OUTRIGHT VERMONT | $12,000 |
| COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND | $10,000 |
| JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM | $7,500 |
| TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY | $7,500 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF ADDISON COUNTY | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY | $5,000 |
| LAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMITTEE INC | $4,000 |
| ONE GOOD DEED FUND | $3,500 |
| PRIDE CENTER OF VERMONT INC | $1,500 |
| WOOD4GOOD LTD | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $96k · revenue +94%
- HIHowardCenter Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +52%
- JMJanet Munt Family Room7× · 2018–2025 · $66k · revenue +326%
Funded once
- BCBURLINGTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2019 · $5k
- SYSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +55%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR A RESILIENT MONTPELIER INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.
Our mission is to strengthen families and communities by improving human relationships. We do this through the training of expert family therapists, advisors, leaders, and family members in Bowen Family Systems Theory.
Provide psychology & counseling to members of society who display behavior & psychological problems.
To be a trusted source of community based channels, tools and training that helps citizens and organizations expand their reach and impact.
Rutland County Pride educates, advocates and celebrates with and for the LGBTQIA2S+ Vermonters and allies.
Providing a drop in center, meeting facilities, and transitional housing for those in need of help with addiction. Also provide recovery coaching on site and on call.
The Center is a resource for family growth and development in Rutland County, Vermont.
To provide life-saving harm reduction services, education, and resources to vermonters affected by hiv, hepatitis c, and substance use by increasing access to care, reducing social stigmas, and building relationships.
The community justice network of vermont unites the efforts of vermonters seeking to make restorative responses available for people whose lives are
Vermont Parent Child Center Network is designed to assist the 15 Parent Child Centers located in Vermont by providing support and services to families they serve.
Education of the public about the criminal justice system. Direct services to people struggling with substance use disorder, including case managment and recovery support.
Provide direct services to those whose lives are affected by hiv/aids, offer education & supplies to prevent its spread and promote understanding in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc and the most unlike its peers is WOOD4GOOD Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HowardCenter Inc ↗
- Who funds Janet Munt Family Room ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT VERMONT ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT CENTER OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Health Services of Addison Cty Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A RESILIENT MONTPELIER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD4GOOD LTD ↗
- Who funds Pride Center of Vermont Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · The University of Vermont Medical Center · Seventh Generation Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Fanny Allen Corporation · Antonio B and Rita M Pomerleau Foundation Inc · Hoehl Family Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc — 52% of income from government
- Janet Munt Family Room — 44% of income from government
- Pride Center of Vermont Inc — 37% of income from government
- Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc — 23% of income from government
- Outright Vermont — 13% of income from government
- HowardCenter Inc — 8% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660?
Find your warmest path to One-Four-Three Foundation #95-651660 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.