· Private foundation
One Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SICANGU COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $125,000 |
| FLOYD CO CARES INC | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| WV WESLEYAN COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| SEED SOWER | $50,000 |
| BARN COMMUNITY GROUP INC | $30,000 |
| TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS | $21,000 |
| MOTHER JONES | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,750 |
| CIRCULOS | $15,000 |
| INSTIL MINDFULNESS | $10,000 |
| WV HEALING HOME INC | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL | $9,100 |
| SHAFIYY INSTITUTE | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $331k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +8%
- TRTHE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC5× · 2019–2023 · $300k · revenue +89% · 31% of their budget
- WVWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC3× · 2019–2021 · $254k · revenue +241%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $60k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $50k
- NRNew River Conservancygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +471%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…
Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.
International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
Our goal is a more sustainable, just and equal planet. we want forests and biodiversity to thrive, fossil fuels to stay in the ground and corporations to prioritize the interests of people and the planet.
The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Women's Organization Corp and the most unlike its peers is Angelica Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PEACEFUL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC ↗
- Who funds SEED SOWER INC ↗
- Who funds SPROUTING FARMS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Just Vision Inc ↗
- Who funds Sicangu Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER GORGE LEARNING CO-OP ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA ↗
- Who funds BARN Community Group ↗
- Who funds PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS ↗
- Who funds GREENBRIER COUNTY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds IRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds New River Conservancy ↗
- Who funds YEW MOUNTAIN CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHADDULI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMMAN IMMAN WATER IS LIFE ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE RISE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Educational Foundation of America · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Aryan Hope Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · HAND Foundation · Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization One Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.