Skip to content

· Private foundation

One Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$561k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$2.4MCommunity Improvement$1.1MHuman Services$565kCrime & Legal$561kArts & Culture$504kFood & Nutrition$274kReligion$239kInternational$236kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
$3,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SICANGU COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$125,000
FLOYD CO CARES INC$100,000
SEED SOWER$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WV WESLEYAN COLLEGE$50,000
BARN COMMUNITY GROUP INC$30,000
TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS$21,000
MOTHER JONES$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,750
Individual grant recipient$18,750
CIRCULOS$15,000
WV HEALING HOME INC$10,000
INSTIL MINDFULNESS$10,000
NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL$9,100
SHAFIYY INSTITUTE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $331k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $1k → 9%CODE PINK PRODUCTIONS INC: $3k → 5%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $50k → 7%CODE PINK PRODUCTIONS INC: $1k → 5%HEART WALK FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $50k → 7%HEART WALK FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%SEED SOWER: $50k → 20%HEART WALK FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%SEED SOWER: $50k → 20%HEART WALK FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%SEED SOWER INC: $38k → 20%HEART WALK FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%SEED SOWER INC: $38k → 20%SEED SOWER: $38k → 20%SEED SOWER: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 66 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
87

Total granted

$6.3M
$934k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+5%

Still filing today

59%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +8%
  • TR
    THE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $300k · revenue +89% · 31% of their budget
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $254k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • NF
    NCI FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
3
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
4
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
5
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
6
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
7
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
8
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
9
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
10
Global Witness

Our goal is a more sustainable, just and equal planet. we want forests and biodiversity to thrive, fossil fuels to stay in the ground and corporations to prioritize the interests of people and the planet.

International
11
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Women's Organization Corp; the most unlike its peers is Angelica Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/87
Grantees still filing
52/87
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $266,575 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPROUTING FARMS CORPORATION: $212,000 · OtherSPROUTING FARMS CORPORATIONMOTHER JONES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherFORWARD SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA - WV HIVE: $145,000 · OtherYES: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $110,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMIT: $108,160 · Other+116 more: $1,928,041 · Other+116 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,122,334 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION…WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $124,000 · EducationNEW RIVER GORGE LEARNING CO-OP: $111,000 · Education+5 more: $18,680 · EducationCENTER FOR PEACEFUL SOLUTIONS INC: $561,350 · Crime & LegalTHE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $299,500 · Arts & CulturePOSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA: $105,000 · Arts & CultureIRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $52,560 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $14,510 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC: $253,750 · Community ImprovementSicangu Community Development Corporation: $125,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE RISE INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ACTION INC: $30,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $15,200 · Community ImprovementSEED SOWER INC: $216,645 · Human ServicesPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $100,000 · Human Services+4 more: $16,150 · Human ServicesJust Vision Inc: $148,500 · InternationalAMMAN IMMAN WATER IS LIFE: $44,179 · InternationalTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $34,000 · InternationalNational Iranian American Council: $32,100 · InternationalTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $16,150 · InternationalCHILDREN OF PERSIA INC: $13,873 · International+11 more: $38,574 · International
Other$3,049,776Education$2,376,014Crime & Legal$561,350Arts & Culture$471,570Community Improvement$463,950Human Services$332,795International$327,376

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,122,334 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR PEACEFUL SOLUTIONS INC: $561,350 over 2y, 100% of budgetTHE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $299,500 over 5y, 31% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC: $253,750 over 3y, 10% of budgetSEED SOWER INC: $216,645 over 5y, 12% of budgetSPROUTING FARMS CORPORATION: $212,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetJust Vision Inc: $148,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetSicangu Community Development Corporation: $125,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $124,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW RIVER GORGE LEARNING CO-OP: $111,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetPOSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA: $105,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBARN Community Group: $100,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetTHE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS: $85,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetGREENBRIER COUNTY HEALTH ALLIANCE: $70,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetIRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $52,560 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetNew River Conservancy: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSHADDULI CENTER INC: $47,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetAMMAN IMMAN WATER IS LIFE: $44,179 over 3y, 22% of budgetVILLAGE RISE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $34,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNational Iranian American Council: $32,100 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD STEWARDSHIP INSTITUTE: $30,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINDEPENDENT BAPTIST MISSION FOR WV: $29,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetANGELICA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetFUTURE GENERATIONS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINSTILL MINDFULNESS: $19,378 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $17,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $16,150 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN OF PERSIA INC: $13,873 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $10,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHEART WALK FOUNDATION: $9,050 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetTHE SUN PUBLISHING COMPANY: $8,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $8,138 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetProject Turquoise Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetMUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES: $7,318 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetREFUGEPOINT INC: $6,525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $6,125 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation: $6,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMUSLIM WOMEN'S ORGANIZATION CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ONENESS FAMILY SCHOOL: $4,630 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCODE PINK PRODUCTIONS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetIslamic Education Center Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHASHAMANE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PEACEFUL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIFFRAFF ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SEED SOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPROUTING FARMS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Just Vision Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sicangu Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER GORGE LEARNING CO-OP ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BARN Community Group ↗
  • Who funds THE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER COUNTY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds IRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YEW MOUNTAIN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds New River Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SHADDULI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMMAN IMMAN WATER IS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE RISE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Educational Foundation of America · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Aryan Hope Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · HAND Foundation · Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on One’s filings →

More from the funding graph