Skip to content

· Private foundation

One Accord Charity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$756k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$243k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$2.7MInternational$1.0MEducation$725kYouth Development$404kArts & Culture$375kCommunity Improvement$200kHuman Services$97kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $593k
$44,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Haven of Hope Christian Service$243,000
Rainbow Missions$106,000
Trans World Radio$100,000
Chinese Christian Mission Seattle Gospel Center$80,000
EFCC Spring Church$64,350
Advocates for Success in Africa$44,200
Lifewire Foundation Limited$25,800
Tyndale$25,000
Gratia Foundation Ltd$21,900
Eternity Music Ministry$15,500
Christian Chinese Library$15,000
Metta Mission and Community Ministry$14,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 53% of grant dollars ($3.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 47% that went abroad ($3.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FULLNESS IN CHRIST FELLOWSHIP: $100k → 10%Love and Conflict Peacemaking: $125k → 14%AFSIA: $19k → 16%THE ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT FUND FOR KCAC: $50k → 9%Asian Hope: $100k → 12%FareStart Training Program: $30k → 9%Jumpah: $111k → 9%Tyndale: $45k → 12%Asian Hope: $100k → 8%Advocates for Success in Africa: $46k → 10%FULLNESS IN CHRIST FELLOWSHIP: $70k → 10%Love and Conflict Peacemaking: $50k → 14%THE ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT FUND FOR KCAC: $50k → 9%FARESTART: $20k → 9%JUMPAH: $100k → 9%Tyndale: $25k → 12%ASIAN HOPE: $100k → 8%Advocates for Success in Africa: $44k → 10%THE ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT FUND FOR KCAC: $50k → 9%School Connect WA: $96k → 9%CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION FOR SEATTLE GOSPEL CENTER: $80k → 9%TYNDALE: $14k → 12%ASIAN HOPE: $100k → 8%Advocates for Success in Africa: $30k → 10%CMA Alliance Development Fund: $50k → 9%School Connect WA: $95k → 9%JUMPAH: $45k → 9%ASIAN HOPE: $75k → 8%Advocates for Success in Africa: $25k → 10%School Connect WA: $65k → 9%JUMPAH: $25k → 9%Trans World Radio: $29k → 8%ADVOCATES FOR SUCCESS IN AFRICA: $13k → 9%Jumpah: $58k → 9%CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION FOR SEATTLE GOSPEL CENTER: $80k → 9%SEATTLE GOSPEL CENTER: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NV
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
OK

Beyond the US: 47% of all-years giving ($3.1M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Hong Kong$2.7M · 27 grants
Canada$306k · 5 grants
Australia$44k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 22 repeat orgs$682k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -42% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$5.8M
$556k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-42%

Still filing today

27%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyInternationalEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Rainbow Mission Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $524k · revenue +11% · 36% of their budget
  • AH
    ASIAN HOPE INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $375k · revenue +103%
  • SC
    SCHOOL CONNECT WA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $256k · revenue +600% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • YD
    YAO DAO PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $161k
  • AH
    Asian Hope
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CP
    CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH YAO DAO PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Haven of Hope Christian Service: $945,000 · OtherHaven of Hope Christian ServiceIndividual grant recipient: $597,709 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJumpah: $338,500 · OtherJumpahTrans World Radio: $334,500 · OtherTrans World RadioChinese Christian Mission Seattle Gospel Center: $310,000 · OtherChinese Christian Mission Seattle Gospel CenterGLOW WORLDWIDE FOR GLOW CAMBODIA: $220,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherEMMANUAL PRIMARY SCHOOL (HK): $194,000 · OtherLove and Conflict Peacemaking: $175,000 · Other+19 more: $1,570,885 · Other+19 moreRainbow Mission Inc: $523,500 · ReligionRainbow Missi…Fullness in Christ Fellowship: $170,000 · ReligionFullness in C…GOSPEL CARRIER INTERNATIONAL INC: $48,000 · ReligionGOSPEL CARRIE…ASIAN HOPE INC: $375,000 · PhilanthropySCHOOL CONNECT WA: $255,679 · EducationADVOCATES FOR SUCCESS IN AFRICA: $158,177 · InternationalFARESTART: $20,000 · Employment
Other$4,885,594Religion$741,500Philanthropy$375,000Education$255,679International$158,177Employment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRainbow Mission Inc: $523,500 over 5y, 36% of budgetASIAN HOPE INC: $375,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSCHOOL CONNECT WA: $255,679 over 3y, 69% of budgetFullness in Christ Fellowship: $170,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetADVOCATES FOR SUCCESS IN AFRICA: $158,177 over 5y, 87% of budgetGOSPEL CARRIER INTERNATIONAL INC: $48,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetFARESTART: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rainbow Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL CONNECT WA ↗
  • Who funds Fullness in Christ Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR SUCCESS IN AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL CARRIER INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Accord Charity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Accord Charity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to One Accord Charity Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to One Accord Charity Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on One Accord Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph