Skip to content

· Private foundation

On Eagles Wings International

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2019
6
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$89kAnimals$27kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2019 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES$16,000
KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES$1,000
FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC$1,000
BILL WINSTON MINISTRIES$1,000
HEALING RIVER MINISTRIES$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($94k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($42k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMPACT CHURCH: $500 → 11%PASTOR FELIPE RUELAS: $1k → 9%HEALING RIVER MINISTRIES: $100 → 8%PROJECT WILDLIFE: $250 → 11%AL FORNISS MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $3k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US: $8k → 14%KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES: $3k → 8%JERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES: $16k → 11%FULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLY: $10k → 15%JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES: $5k → 9%BENNY HINN: $50 → 12%FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $1k → 9%PETA VANGUARD SOCIETY: $5k → 19%LAS VEGAS CHURCH OF THE HARVEST: $500 → 13%NEWBREAK CHURCH: $450 → 11%CENTERPOINT CHURCH: $750 → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US: $250 → 14%KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES: $1k → 8%JERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES: $150 → 11%PETA: $5k → 19%LAS VEGAS CHURCH OF THE VALLEY: $360 → 13%SHADOW MOUNTAIN CMMTY CHURCH: $500 → 11%PETA: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
OR
NV
IN
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
OK
TX

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($42k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Philippines$42k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 6 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +147% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
18

Total granted

$58k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%
-25%

Still filing today

33%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LAZARIAN WORLD HOMES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • JS
    JERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $16k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k

Funded once

  • AC
    ASIAN CHRISTIAN FAITH GLOBAL MINIST
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
  • FG
    FULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • PV
    PETA VANGUARD SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASIAN CHRISTIAN FAITH GLOBAL MINIST: $41,990 · OtherASIAN CHRISTIAN FAITH GLOBAL MINISTLAZARIAN WORLD HOMES: $20,000 · OtherLAZARIAN WORLD HOMESJERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES INC: $16,150 · OtherJERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES INCFULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLY: $10,000 · OtherFULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLYHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US: $7,750 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE USPETA VANGUARD SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Other+18 more: $16,195 · Other+18 morePEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $6,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICA…RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $2,500 · AnimalsRED BUCKET …
Other$122,085Animals$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBILL WINSTON MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarilyn Neubauer Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOSPEL REVIVALS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds BILL WINSTON MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Marilyn Neubauer Ministries ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL REVIVALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization On Eagles Wings International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from On Eagles Wings International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on On Eagles Wings International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph