Skip to content
Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation

TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE WITH THERAPEUTIC, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES OF CHILDREN.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$46kEmployment$21kEducation$14kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$4kHealth$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHELSEA CHASE 5K RACE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,073
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN$1,000
WINCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOL$500
WINCHESTER PMC KIDS RIDE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BANGOR YMCA: $1k → 15%JANE DOE INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 9 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$69k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+49%

Still filing today

44%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +89%
  • EE
    ELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +198%
  • MD
    MARATHON DAFFODILS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CS
    CAREER SERVICE FUND - GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UVM
    one grant, 2019 · $21k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH MASSACHUSETTS & RHODE ISLAND
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • BY
    BANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +140%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc

Our mission is to always welcome and connect young people and families to opportunities that embrace diversity, nurture growth, and inspire success.

Youth Development
3
Danvers Educational Enrichment Program
—
4
Boys and Girls Club of Webster-Dudley Inc

The organization's mission is to provide a variety of recreational, educational and cultural activities for the youth in the webster-dudley massachusetts area.

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc

Our mission is to help youth, especially those who need us most, develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and community leaders, through caring professional staff who forge relationships with our youth members and…

—
6
Berkshire Education and Correction Services Inc
Crime & Legal
7
The Boys and Girls Club of Assabet Valley Inc

The mission of the boys & girls club of assabet valley is to promote the growth of young people in our community by empowering them to become productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Human Services
8
Boys & Girls Club of Marshfield Inc

The organization's mission is to enable and inspire all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens as well as become tomorrows capable leaders, while supporting local families and community.

Youth Development
9
Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

—
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc

To provide guidance social, educational, physical and cultural programming for boys and girls in the greater metrowest, massachusetts area. the intent of these programs is to enhance development during the growth years of children and to…

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
12
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ellis Early Learning Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marathon Daffodils Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCCAREER SERVICE FUND - GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UVM: $21,250 · OtherCAREER SERVICE FUND - GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UVMTHE HAT TRICK CLUB INC: $3,860 · OtherMAKE A WISH MASSACHUSETTS & RHODE ISLAND: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $12,958 · Other+15 moreELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC: $10,000 · EducationELLIS EARLY…HOMEWORK HOUSE INC: $500 · EducationWINCHESTER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $2,533 · PhilanthropyBirthday Wishes Inc: $500 · PhilanthropyMARATHON DAFFODILS INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentBANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesJANE DOE INC THE MA COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $500 · Human ServicesDANTE ALIGHIERI SOCIETY OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWINCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL TRUST: $500 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY: $500 · Youth DevelopmentSERVICE CLUB OF ANDOVER: $500 · Community ImprovementCHELSEA BLACK COMMUNITY: $300 · Community Improvement
Other$86,068Education$10,500Philanthropy$3,033Environment$2,000Human Services$1,500Arts & Culture$1,500Youth Development$1,500Community Improvement$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINCHESTER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $2,533 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMARATHON DAFFODILS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetBANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANTE ALIGHIERI SOCIETY OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWORK HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJANE DOE INC THE MA COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE CLUB OF ANDOVER: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHELSEA BLACK COMMUNITY: $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Agnes M Lindsay TrustAmerican Tower Corpor…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Homework House Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Ellis Early Learning Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Chelsea Black Community: 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Olivia's Organics’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home