· Private foundation
Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation
TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE WITH THERAPEUTIC, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES OF CHILDREN.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHELSEA CHASE 5K RACE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $2,073 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN | $1,000 |
| WINCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $500 |
| WINCHESTER PMC KIDS RIDE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC3× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +89%
- EEELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +198%
- MDMARATHON DAFFODILS INC2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- CSCAREER SERVICE FUND - GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UVMone grant, 2019 · $21k
- MAMAKE A WISH MASSACHUSETTS & RHODE ISLANDone grant, 2019 · $3k
- BYBANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +140%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
Our mission is to always welcome and connect young people and families to opportunities that embrace diversity, nurture growth, and inspire success.
The organization's mission is to provide a variety of recreational, educational and cultural activities for the youth in the webster-dudley massachusetts area.
Our mission is to help youth, especially those who need us most, develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and community leaders, through caring professional staff who forge relationships with our youth members and…
The mission of the boys & girls club of assabet valley is to promote the growth of young people in our community by empowering them to become productive, caring, responsible citizens.
The organization's mission is to enable and inspire all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens as well as become tomorrows capable leaders, while supporting local families and community.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To provide guidance social, educational, physical and cultural programming for boys and girls in the greater metrowest, massachusetts area. the intent of these programs is to enhance development during the growth years of children and to…
Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…
The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ellis Early Learning Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marathon Daffodils Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ELLIS EARLY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds WINCHESTER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds MARATHON DAFFODILS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC ↗
- Who funds BANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DANTE ALIGHIERI SOCIETY OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HOMEWORK HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WINCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL TRUST ↗
- Who funds Birthday Wishes Inc ↗
- Who funds SERVICE CLUB OF ANDOVER ↗
- Who funds JANE DOE INC THE MA COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA BLACK COMMUNITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Olivia's Organics Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Homework House Inc — 38% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Ellis Early Learning Inc — 20% of income from government
- Chelsea Black Community — 3% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.