Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$51kEducation$21kYouth Development$17kHealth$10kHuman Services$5kInternational$1kAnimals$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$314k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION$4,500
REDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
ECMC FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
KALEIDOSCOPE$500
MIND OVER MATTER FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUFFALO: $1k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 10 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$114k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+56%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +11%
  • WS
    Wright State University Foundation Inc
    4× · 2018–2021 · $14k · revenue +93%
  • HILBERT COLLEGE
    5× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • CM
    CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -10%
  • YC
    YOUNGSTOWN COMMUNITY BOATING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation

The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
11
University At Buffalo Surgeons Inc

University at buffalo surgeons, inc., is a large team of surgeons dedicated to the improvement of the health of our patients, cutting edge research, and the professional development of our students and residents. we are committed to…

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecmc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kaleidoscope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NEW YORK: $25,500 · OtherREDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NEW YORKST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF BUFFALO & WNY: $4,500 · OtherVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF BUFFALO & WNY+6 more: $6,000 · Other+6 moreWright State University Foundation Inc: $13,500 · EducationWright State Unive…HILBERT COLLEGE: $7,100 · EducationHILBERT COLLEGEBUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUFFALO SABRES …ECMC FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthHAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 · HealthROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesTHE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUFFALO: $1,000 · Human ServicesZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC: $1,000 · AnimalsJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $750 · Religion
Other$76,700Education$20,600Youth Development$17,000Health$4,500Philanthropy$4,000Human Services$2,250Animals$1,000Religion$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWright State University Foundation Inc: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILBERT COLLEGE: $7,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUFFALO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wright State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILBERT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ECMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUFFALO ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KALEIDOSCOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · James H Cummings Foundation Inc · The Baird Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oliver C and Julia Hamister Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph