· Public charity
Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso
To provide an educational forum for solutions to emerging industry issues, professional standards, and improved safety, integrity, engineering and operational efficiencies among municipal contractors.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION | $8,237 |
| ST LUKE'S FOOD MINISTRY | $8,237 |
| THE HALO PROJECT | $8,237 |
| JD MCCARTY CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $8,237 |
| THE LIVING FAITH MINISTRY | $8,237 |
| NOAH'S HEAVEN SEVEN FOUNDATION | $8,237 |
| CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $8,237 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +59%
- LFLIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue 0% · 86% of their budget
CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue -4%
Funded once
- GOGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCone grant, 2017 · $231k · revenue +9%
- SLST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $36k
- TCThe Children's Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue +141%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go
Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Children & Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTAS CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Path to Miracles Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC ↗
- Who funds Down Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · American Fidelity Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Servant Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Butterfield Memorial Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.