How much does Oklahoma Casa Association Inc give?

Oklahoma Casa Association Inc reported 18 grants totaling $969,045 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 22 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Oklahoma Casa Association Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (93%), Human Services (7%).

Who are Oklahoma Casa Association Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Casa of Oklahoma County Inc ($1.8M), Tulsa Casa Inc ($940k), Court Appointed Special Advocate for Children Inc ($779k).

Does Oklahoma Casa Association Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Oklahoma Casa Association Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Oklahoma Bar Foundation, Arvest Foundation, Sarkeys Foundation.

Where is Oklahoma Casa Association Inc based?

Oklahoma Casa Association Inc is based in OK.

Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

Oklahoma Casa Association Inc at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

$969k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$197k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$8.5MHuman Services$644k

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k9 grants · $340k
$50k–250k7 grants · $616k

$48,408

Median grant

States reached

$3.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY	$196,894
TULSA CASA	$90,505
SAN BOIS CASA	$79,660
CASA FOR CHILDREN INC	$72,159
CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA	$64,086
CHILD ADVOCATES NE OK (TRI-COUNTY)	$59,733
CASA OF WESTERN OK (MULTI-CO YOUTH)	$52,873
CANADIAN COUNTY CASA	$49,948
FOURTH JD CASA (GARFIELD CO)	$48,408
CASA FOR KIDS	$46,733
CASA OF SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA	$40,628
OKMULGEE COUNTY FAM RESOURCE CTR	$38,319
UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION INC	$36,700
CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN	$35,571
22ND JUDICIAL DIST CASA	$30,626

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$9.1M · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.1M

Still filing today

96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalEducationOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CO
CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +6%
MY
Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc
9× · 2017–2025 · $582k · revenue +15%
SB
SAN BOIS CASA INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +25% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County

—

Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights

Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa of Liberty/Chambers Counties

None

Human Services

Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—

Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights

Mid-Ozark Casa Program

The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.

Community Improvement

Casa of Western Oklahoma Casa of Western Oklahoma

The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.

Human Services

Casa of Natrona County

To provide the court with objective information regarding the status of children involved in abuse or neglect cases. Duties of the appointed advocate would include gathering information, developing recommendations, and providing written…

Human Services

29TH Judicial Casa Program

The program provides trained community volunteers to serve as court appointed social advocates for abused and neglected children involved in court proceedings.

Human Services

Casa-Voices for Children

To recruit, train and supervise community volunteers to advocate for children/youth who have experienced abuse and/or neglect who are within the legal jurisdiction of the state.

Civil Rights

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Northeast Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

14/22

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Civil Rights$3,684,932Crime & Legal$2,948,052Human Services$2,074,629Education$229,857Other$196,999

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma Bar FoundationOK26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma Bar Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Casa Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Casa Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Oklahoma Casa Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home