· Public charity
Oklahoma Bar Foundation
The OKLAHOMA BAR FOUNDATION provides annual funding through grants to promote the advancement of justice, to provide critical civil legal services to those in need, and to increase public awareness and understanding of the american legal system.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 61 grants below total $3,145,214 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,246,781 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,567 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k39 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAWYERS HELPING LAWYERS FOUNDATION | $210,000 |
| OCU LAW SCHOOL | $196,100 |
| OKLAHOMA LAWYERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INC | $140,000 |
| LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA | $140,000 |
| THE SPERO PROJECT | $140,000 |
| SAFE CENTER INC | $110,000 |
| TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (PROJECT COMMUTATION PROGRAM) | $100,000 |
| OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION | $85,000 |
| OKLAHOMA GUARDIAN AD LITEM INSTITUTE | $85,000 |
| DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE COUNTY | $83,000 |
| SHELTERWELL INC | $76,806 |
| DISTRICT COURT OF OKMULGEE COUNTY | $76,089 |
| TRINITY LEGAL CLINIC | $75,000 |
| TULSA LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC | $70,000 |
| OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE | $65,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
58 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $580k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +138%- OCOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $730k · revenue +32%
- OLOKLAHOMA LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $639k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- NBNEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $160k · revenue +59%
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF OKone grant, 2017 · $75k
CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +261%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Court Appointed Special Advocate
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
To provide statewide services for victims of and witnesses to child abuse and other crimes with a sensitive, compassionate response through skilled interviewing, referral to helping agencies, community outreach, and professional education.
Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.
Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.
To train community volunteers to serve as advocates for abused and neglected children in northeastern oklahoma and, through multidisciplinary collaborative efforts, ensure the childs rights to safety and permanence in a family.
The organization's mission is to prevent and respond to abuse and victimization through proven child-centered methods, professional forensic interviews, and collaborative advocacy.
Child Advocacy Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Guardian Ad Litem Institute and the most unlike its peers is Latitude Legal Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds Trinity Legal Clinic of Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds Safe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA GUARDIAN AD LITEM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE SPERO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Teen Court Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF OKLAHOMA CITY & OKLAHOMA/CANADIAN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds LHL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PEORIA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN COUNTY CASA INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERWELL INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Tulsa Community College Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Arvest Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Cresap Family Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties — 72% of income from government
- United Community Action Program Inc — 62% of income from government
- Neighbors Building Neighborhoods Inc — 27% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Youth Services of Tulsa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Community Crisis Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
- Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Florida Bar Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.