Skip to content
Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc

The Oklahoma AIDS Care Fund is a fundraising and advocacy organization dedicated to providing financial support and resources to HIV/AIDS service providers in the state of Oklahoma.

$106k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Health$156kCommunity Improvement$26kHuman Services$16k
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $92,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,181 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,181 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAIN Oklahoma$18,000
Other Options Inc$15,000
Guiding Right Inc$15,000
Teen emPower$10,000
Latino Community Development$10,000
Planned Parenthood Great Plai$9,000
HOPE$8,000
NorthCare$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Teen emPower: $10k → 16%Teen emPower: $6k → 16%Latino Community Development: $16k → 16%Latino Community Development: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 7 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$184k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+433%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
HealthHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OO
    Other Options Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $38k · revenue +108%
  • RA
    REGIONAL AIDS INTERCOMMUNITY NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $37k · revenue +36%
  • GR
    GUIDING RIGHT INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $31k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • HI
    HEARTLINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +433%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Alliance Inc

Creating safe, attractive, and healthy neighborhoods throughout Central Oklahoma.

Community Improvement
2
Oklahoma Decides Inc

Education and issue advocacy related to helping Oklahomans understand their Constitutional right to decide issues for themselves at the ballot box.

—
3
Heartland Health Resource Center

Empowering people effected by HIV/AIDS to become healthier and self sufficient through comprehensive medical care, compassionate support and education.

Health
4
Hiv Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa Cares

Tulsa CARES is committed to delivering tailored and integrated programs and services that support clients in accessing medical care, achieving treatment adherence, experiencing improved health outcomes, and living an enhanced quality of…

Health
5
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
6
Hope Clinic Inc

Empower individuals to make informed choices about pregnancy, options and sexual and reproductive health decisions.

Human Services
7
Options Health

Options Health is a non-profit organization providing no cost health- care education, and support services to women, men, and their families in the areas of pregnancy, sexual health, and other related concerns.

Health
8
Oklahoma City Pride Alliance Inc dba Oklahoma Pride Alliance

The Oklahoma Pride Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focusing on the 2SLGBTQIA+ population and is committed to dismantling oppression through community empowerment, advocacy, and celebration. We center those most impacted by injustice to…

Civil Rights
9
Covenant Behavioral Health

Counseling

Health
10
Allies Linked for the Prevention of Hiv and Aids

Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected

Health
11
Informed Choices

To provide a gospel centered approach to empower individuals to make informed pregnancy and sexual health choices.

Health
12
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Teen Empower Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other Options Inc: $38,000 · HealthOther Options IncGUIDING RIGHT INC: $31,000 · HealthGUIDING RIGHT INCHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $18,500 · HealthHealth Outreach Prevention Education IncNorthCare General Pershing Inc: $17,000 · HealthNorthCare General Pershing IncHEARTLINE INC: $5,500 · HealthLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP…TEEN EMPOWER INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesTEEN EMPOWER INCREGIONAL AIDS INTERCOMMUNITY NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $37,000 · EmploymentREGIONAL AIDS INTERCO…Planned Parenthood Great Plai: $9,000 · Other
Health$110,000Human Services$42,000Employment$37,000Other$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUIDING RIGHT INC: $31,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $18,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNorthCare General Pershing Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTEEN EMPOWER INC: $16,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHEARTLINE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Oklahoma City Communi…Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Guiding Right Inc: 28% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oklahoma Aids Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home