· Public charity
Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc
The Oklahoma AIDS Care Fund is a fundraising and advocacy organization dedicated to providing financial support and resources to HIV/AIDS service providers in the state of Oklahoma.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $92,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $106,181 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,181 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAIN Oklahoma | $18,000 |
| Other Options Inc | $15,000 |
| Guiding Right Inc | $15,000 |
| Latino Community Development | $10,000 |
| Teen emPower | $10,000 |
| Planned Parenthood Great Plai | $9,000 |
| HOPE | $8,000 |
| NorthCare | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOOther Options Inc2× · 2018–2019 · $38k · revenue +108%
- RAREGIONAL AIDS INTERCOMMUNITY NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA INC2× · 2018–2019 · $37k · revenue +36%
- GRGUIDING RIGHT INC2× · 2018–2019 · $31k · revenue +146%
Funded once
- HIHEARTLINE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +433%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Creating safe, attractive, and healthy neighborhoods throughout Central Oklahoma.
Education and issue advocacy related to helping Oklahomans understand their Constitutional right to decide issues for themselves at the ballot box.
Empowering people effected by HIV/AIDS to become healthier and self sufficient through comprehensive medical care, compassionate support and education.
Tulsa CARES is committed to delivering tailored and integrated programs and services that support clients in accessing medical care, achieving treatment adherence, experiencing improved health outcomes, and living an enhanced quality of…
Empower individuals to make informed choices about pregnancy, options and sexual and reproductive health decisions.
Options Health is a non-profit organization providing no cost health- care education, and support services to women, men, and their families in the areas of pregnancy, sexual health, and other related concerns.
The Oklahoma Pride Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focusing on the 2SLGBTQIA+ population and is committed to dismantling oppression through community empowerment, advocacy, and celebration. We center those most impacted by injustice to…
Counseling
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
To provide a gospel centered approach to empower individuals to make informed pregnancy and sexual health choices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Teen Empower Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Other Options Inc ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL AIDS INTERCOMMUNITY NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc ↗
- Who funds NorthCare General Pershing Inc ↗
- Who funds TEEN EMPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Guiding Right Inc — 28% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.