· Public charity
Ohio Children's Alliance
Fostering a brighter tomorrow for Ohio's children and families through advocacy, innovation, and collaboration with health and human service organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $1,844,697 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,690,327 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $845,630 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $446k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $925k
- $250k+1 grant · $462k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NYAP | $461,686 |
| Cadence Care Network (v) | $201,874 |
| Sojourners Care Network | $104,689 |
| Beech Brook | $101,139 |
| Buckeye Ranch | $79,712 |
| Bellefaire Jewish Childrens Bureau | $75,000 |
| Adriel School Inc | $71,215 |
| New Path | $69,475 |
| Focus on Youth Inc | $57,697 |
| Agape for Youth | $56,058 |
| Pathway | $55,426 |
| Northeast Ohio Adoption Services | $52,332 |
| SAFY of Ohio | $46,002 |
| UMCH Family Services | $44,752 |
| HOPE Campus | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 99% of Ohio Children's Alliance’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC3× · 2023–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +32%
- SVST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES2× · 2023–2024 · $516k · revenue +57%
- SASPECIALIZED ALTERNATIVES FOR FAMILIES & YOUTH OF OHIO INC3× · 2023–2025 · $456k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $319k
- LCLighthouse Communications LLCone grant, 2023 · $89k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $76k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.
It is our mission to demonstrate the love and compassion of jesus christ by protecting and enhancing the safety and well-being of persons from all backgrounds and across the continuum of life through the effective integration of the…
Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.
Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
The children's center's mission is to help children and families shape their own futures.
To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.
A trauma-informed Healthcare Organization, CHNK Behavioral Health creates Holistic Partnerships for Health and Wellness that are inclusive, innovative and inspiring.
To provide mental health care to children, adults, and families of the fairfield county area and occasionally to other counties in the state of ohio
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Pride of Northeast Ohio Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amazing Grace Treatment Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SPECIALIZED ALTERNATIVES FOR FAMILIES & YOUTH OF OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CADENCE CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
- Who funds EASTWAY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE BUCKEYE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Nationwide Children's Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BELLEFAIRE JEWISH CHILDREN'S BUREAU ↗
- Who funds Beech Brook ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds Adriel School Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SJO KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MARIE'S HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ADVOCATE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE NEW PATH INC ↗
- Who funds PRESSLEY RIDGE ↗
- Who funds THE VIAQUEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Southeast Inc ↗
- Who funds ENA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PRIDE OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN HAVE OPTIONS IN CARING ENVIRONMENTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association · The Cleveland Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Most Valuable Kids of Greater Cincinnati · Akron Community Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Healthpath Foundation of Ohio · Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc · Ticket to Dream Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Tickets for Kids Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ohio Children's Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trout Lake Nature Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.