Skip to content

· Private foundation

Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$12MReligion$1.2MHuman Services$820kRecreation & Sports$590kHealth$508kYouth Development$255kPhilanthropy$55kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k33 grants · $840k
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $1.8M
$35,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BASIC FUND$150,000
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$100,000
LUMEN CHRISTI ACADEMIES ROMAN CATH OAKLA$100,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY$100,000
YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE$80,000
ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY$75,000
ARSHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
SAINT JOSEPH NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$70,000
SAINT EDWARDS SCHOOL$60,000
CRISTO REY SAN JOS HIGH SCHOOL$60,000
DE MARILLAC ACADEMY$60,000
CARONDELET HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
ST PETERS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$50,000
OUR LADY OF MERCY SCHOOL$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $30k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $35k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY: $30k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPA: $25k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPA: $25k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPA: $25k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AN REHABILITATION CEN: $25k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHABILITATION: $25k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 90 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
37

Total granted

$14M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+46%

Still filing today

21%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BASIC FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $900k · revenue +65%
  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $700k · revenue +35%
  • YT
    YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $530k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF OAKLAND CA DEPARTMENT OF
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • SA
    ST ANTHONY IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • CH
    CARONDELET HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
2
St Paul's Day School of Oakland Dba St Paul's Episcopal School

St. paul's prepares students to be confident and skilled learners, cultivates in them a strong sense of purpose, and inspires them to be generous and active citizens of the world.

—
3
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
4
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
5
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
6
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
7
The College Preparatory School

At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…

Education
8
Stanbridge Academy

Private school for students with mild to moderate learning differences working with families to provide a safe educational environment.

—
9
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
10
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
11
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund; the most unlike its peers is Exceptional Needs Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY: $700,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMYST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY: $450,000 · OtherST JOSEPH NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $405,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE: $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $400,000 · Other+107 more: $9,316,000 · Other+107 moreTHE BASIC FUND: $900,000 · EducationTHE BASIC FUNDTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $700,000 · EducationTHOMAS AQUINAS COLL…CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $355,000 · EducationCRISTO REY SAN JOSE…BAY SCHOLARS: $350,000 · EducationBAY SCHOLARSSACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $128,505 · Education+7 more: $255,000 · Education+7 moreYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $530,000 · Recreation & SportsLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $140,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $80,000 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $50,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $180,000 · HealthGiant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc: $45,000 · HealthEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $42,500 · HealthSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $145,000 · Youth DevelopmentOld Skool Cafe: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $115,000 · Philanthropy
Other$11,671,000Education$2,688,505Recreation & Sports$530,000Human Services$280,000Health$267,500Youth Development$205,000Philanthropy$115,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BASIC FUND: $900,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $700,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $530,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY: $450,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $355,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBAY SCHOLARS: $350,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $180,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $145,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $140,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $115,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTERNE SCHOOL: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGiant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $42,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOld Skool Cafe: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME DE NAMUR UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE PURPOSE SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF ST JAMES: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $25,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetRICHMOND PROMISE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL NEEDS NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BASIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BAY SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
  • Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trust Funds IncorporatedCA49.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trust Funds Incorporated · The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert Foundation · The Joseph & Mercedes McMicking Foundation · Olympic Club Foundation · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Koch Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Janet and Clint Reilly Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main?

    Find your warmest path to Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main’s filings →

    More from the funding graph