Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ocora Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$540k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Animals$1.2MRecreation & Sports$400kHousing & Shelter$130kEducation$100kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$44kCrime & Legal$40kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $510k
$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION$100,000
INNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION$100,000
RESCUE NETWORK INC$100,000
THE BITTY KITTY BRIGADE$80,000
WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MN$80,000
THIS OLD HORSE$50,000
MY VERY OWN BED$17,500
CORNER OF KINDNESS$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THIS OLD HORSE: $50k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$509k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$359k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+12%

Still filing today

75%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    INNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +4%
  • RN
    RESCUE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $370k · revenue +440%
  • BK
    BITTY KITTY BRIGADE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $202k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ROSEVILLE HARRIET ALEXANDER NATURE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TR
    THE RAPTOR CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
2
Rescue Crew Inc

We save the lives of companion animals in need -- including those who are homeless abandoned neglected or at risk. Through compassion kindness and care we help them heal and thrive ultimately becoming cherished family members in loving…

Animals
3
Ruff Start Rescue Inc

Ruff start rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of animals in need. we improve animal welfare in communities through adoption, education, and providing resources for people and pets.

Animals
4
Lacrescent Animal Rescue Inc

Established in 2005, La Crescent Animal Rescue (LAR) is an all-volunteer, non-profit 501(c) 3 organization dedicated to the protection and welfare of animals in La Crescent, Minnesota. Our rescue shelter depends solely on the support and…

Animals
5
Pet Haven Inc of Minnesota

Pet haven rescues and re-homes cats and dogs, spays and neuters to reduce over population, promotes companion animal welfare, and advocates on behalf of companion animals.

Animals
6
Tri-County Humane Society

We believe in the human-animal bond and exist to support the animals and people of central minnesota by practicing and promoting quality animal care, offering compassionate customer service, and providing humane education.

Animals
7
Friends of Animal Adoptions Inc

Friends of animal adoptions, inc. (the organization), is a minnesota non- profit organization whose mission is to prevent cruelty to animals; provide shelter, emergency and other medical care; and to find good adoptive homes for cats,…

Animals
8
Great River Rescue

Operation of an animal shelter for unwanted and abandoned animals, community education to encourage humane treatment and responsible ownership.

Animals
9
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
10
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
11
Minn-Kota Paaws People Advocating Animal Welfare Services

To offer financial assistance to individuals to aid them in spaying/neuter companion animals and to decrease the number of animals euthanized at local pounds.

Animals
12
Raskels Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Red Lake Rosie's Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Simpson Housing Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RESCUE NETWORK INC — $370,000 · AnimalsRESCUE NETWORK INCBITTY KITTY BRIGADE — $202,000 · AnimalsBITTY KITTY BRIGADEMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $100,000 · AnimalsMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATIONCORNER OF KINDNESS INC — $62,000 · AnimalsCORNER OF KINDNESS INCCOCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE — $50,000 · AnimalsCOCO'S HEART DOG RESCUERED LAKE ROSIE'S RESCUE INC — $50,000 · AnimalsRED LAKE ROSIE'S RESCUE INCWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MN — $230,000 · OtherWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CE…SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC — $65,000 · OtherSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES I…FRIENDS OF ROSEVILLE HARRIET ALEXANDER NATURE CENTER INC — $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ROSEVILLE HARRI…THE RAPTOR CENTER — $50,000 · OtherTHE RAPTOR CENTERTHE CREW — $40,000 · OtherTHE CREW+2 more — $19,000 · OtherINNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION — $400,000 · Recreation & SportsINNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDA…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationMy Very Own Bed — $64,500 · Housing & ShelterTHIS OLD HORSE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $40,000 · Crime & Legal
Animals$834,000Other$454,000Recreation & Sports$400,000Education$100,000Housing & Shelter$64,500Human Services$50,000Crime & Legal$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetRESCUE NETWORK INC — $370,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetBITTY KITTY BRIGADE — $202,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMy Very Own Bed — $64,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOCO'S HEART DOG RESCUE — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRED LAKE ROSIE'S RESCUE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ocora Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ocora Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ocora Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph