Skip to content

· Public charity

Ochin Inc

Providing health information technology, software and services exclusively for community health clinics and small practices serving the medically underserved.

$707k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.0MEducation$542kScience & Tech$409k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $603k
$93,892
Median grant
5
States reached
$195M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHSU$146,644
HCN$131,825
OHSU$130,389
FENWAY$100,240
OHSU$93,892
OREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION$43,667
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$39,497
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$10,776
FENWAY$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $127k → 16%HEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $110k → 12%UC IRVINE: $124k → 10%HCN: $178k → 15%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $106k → 5%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $220k → 11%MOREHOUSE SCHOOL: $431k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $100k → 10%FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $124k → 16%HEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $107k → 12%KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $78k → 10%HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK: $140k → 15%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $67k → 5%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $338k → 11%MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $222k → 13%FENWAY: $115k → 16%HEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $87k → 12%KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $43k → 10%HCN: $132k → 15%OREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $44k → 12%FENWAY: $100k → 16%HCN: $107k → 15%OREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $42k → 12%FENWAY: $76k → 16%HCN: $87k → 15%FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $69k → 16%HCN: $61k → 15%FENWAY: $60k → 16%HCN: $45k → 15%FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $46k → 16%HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK: $44k → 15%FENWAY: $41k → 16%OHSU: $306k → 12%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $285k → 12%OHSU: $274k → 12%OHSU: $231k → 12%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $166k → 12%OHSU: $147k → 12%OHSU: $130k → 12%OHSU: $130k → 12%OHSU: $116k → 12%OHSU: $104k → 12%OHSU: $96k → 12%OHSU: $94k → 12%OHSU: $87k → 12%OHSU: $61k → 12%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $52k → 12%OHSU: $47k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OR
CA
CO
NE
KS
NC
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 13 repeat orgs$801k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$7.2M
$762k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+209%

Still filing today

77%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +266%
  • FC
    FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +19%
  • MS
    MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $653k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $338k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2017 · $293k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Public Health Association

To provide optimal, equitable health and well-being for all.

Health
2
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Association of University Programs in Health Administration

Aupha fosters excellence and innovation in healthcare management and health policy education.

Education
5
Association of Academic Health Centers Inc

The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…

—
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Kapi'olani Medical Specialists

Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…

Health
8
American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
12
America's Essential Hospitals

America's essential hospitals champions excellence in health care for all, regardless of social or economic circumstance, and advances the work of hospitals and health systems committed to ensuring access to care and optimal health for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Choice Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kaiser Foundation Hospitals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $2,514,869 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYNORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $338,238 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $292,760 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAAMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $206,552 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANSREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $128,856 · Other+3 more: $243,362 · Other+3 moreHEALTH CHOICE NETWORK INC: $1,280,992 · HealthHEALTH CHOICE NETWORK INCFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,097,112 · HealthFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCHEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $312,755 · HealthHEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INCOREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $202,051 · HealthOREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATIONKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $195,820 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS+3 more: $115,281 · HealthMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $652,920 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOO…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $407,271 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY
Other$3,724,637Health$3,204,011Education$1,060,191

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH CHOICE NETWORK INC: $1,280,992 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,097,112 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $652,920 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $407,271 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $312,755 over 4y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $206,552 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $202,051 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $195,820 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY EMANUEL HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER: $63,718 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations: $31,066 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $20,497 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS ↗
  • Who funds OREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY EMANUEL HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

University of PittsburghPA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Pittsburgh

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ochin Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ochin Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Oregon Primary Care Association: 32% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Health Choice Network Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ochin’s filings →

More from the funding graph