Skip to content

· Private foundation

Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$747kEducation$64kFood & Nutrition$39kInternational$25kHealth$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kPublic Benefit$9kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$496k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST TIKHONS ORTHODOX SEMINARY$25,000
LIFT UP UGANDA$19,480
ST STEVENS SERBIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL$13,600
ST PAISIUS WOMENS MONASTERY$11,000
FOCUS North America$11,000
ST VLADIMIRS SEMINARY$6,000
Chi Omega Foundation$1,500
Trinity Lutheran Church$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SAMARITANS PURSE$1,000
Tunnel to Towers$660
Special Olympics Southern California$500
International Orthodox Christian Charities$500
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$500
FOOD SHARE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOCUS North America: $11k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $6k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $6k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $5k → 11%FOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $5k → 11%FOCUS North America: $4k → 11%ABILITY FIRST: $1k → 14%Ventura County Rescue Mission: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
NV
IA
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$785k · 40 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
40

Total granted

$785k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+21%

Still filing today

43%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FN
    FOCUS NORTH AMERICA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +167%
  • CM
    Claremont McKenna College
    4× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +44%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • NO
    Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HR
    HOLY RESURRECTION ORTHODOX CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SS
    ST SEBASTIAN SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is St Sava Mission Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Paisius Women's Monastery: $260,905 · OtherSt Paisius Women's MonasteryST PAISIUS WOMEN'S ORTHODOX MONASTRY: $106,964 · OtherST PAISIUS WOMEN'S ORTHODOX MONASTRYSt Tikhon's Orthodox Seminary: $87,000 · OtherSt Tikhon's Orthodox SeminaryST VLADIMIRS ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $67,000 · OtherST VLADIMIRS ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYSt Steven's Serbian Cathedral: $58,860 · OtherSt Steven's Serbian CathedralNativity of the Most Holy Theotokos: $50,000 · OtherNativity of the Most Holy TheotokosST VLADIMIR'S THEOLOGICAL MONASTERY: $34,249 · Other+60 more: $171,881 · Other+60 moreFOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $36,115 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,125 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,250 · Human Services+2 more: $2,387 · Human ServicesLIFT UP UGANDA: $19,480 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17,550 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,010 · Education+3 more: $2,500 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,725 · InternationalINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $4,750 · InternationalLeadership Institute: $4,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,800 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,150 · Public BenefitCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropySERBIAN UNITED BENEVOLENT SOCIETY: $950 · PhilanthropyST SAVA MISSION CORPORATION: $2,200 · Youth Development
Other$836,859Human Services$45,877Education$41,540International$10,475Public Benefit$8,950Philanthropy$5,950Youth Development$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOCUS NORTH AMERICA: $36,115 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLIFT UP UGANDA: $19,480 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST SAVA MISSION CORPORATION: $2,200 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,010 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,350 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $1,311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $1,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSERBIAN UNITED BENEVOLENT SOCIETY: $950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOCUS NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LIFT UP UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST SAVA MISSION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Obren B & Marilyn M Gerich’s filings →

More from the funding graph