Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oberfeld Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$128kInternational$60kEnvironment$35kHealth$15kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$481k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$30,000
SINAI TEMPLE$11,555
LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$4,500
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
UNION RESCUE MISSION$500
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$500
MASORTI FOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE$500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$500
LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY$250
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH$200
UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $250 → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%ROSIE'S FOUNDATION: $180 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Oberfeld Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Oberfeld Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 16 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$221k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +55%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • REWILD
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +18%
  • LJ
    LAWRENCE J ELLISON INSTITUTE OF USC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • HO
    HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
7
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services
8
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
11
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Inc

To provide the diabetes research institute with the funding to cure diabetes now.

Health
12
Sherit Isroel

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel City Alliance and the most unlike its peers is The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION — $71,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONSINAI TEMPLE — $50,310 · OtherSINAI TEMPLELA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $12,500 · OtherLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION+14 more — $17,045 · Other+14 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $56,800 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFE…+2 more — $3,500 · International+2 moreREWILD — $35,000 · AnimalsREWILDCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $9,500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $2,000 · Community ImprovementTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $1,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION — $500 · Human ServicesAngel City Alliance — $250 · Human ServicesRosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA — $180 · Human ServicesHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$150,855International$60,300Animals$35,000Health$11,500Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$1,930Youth Development$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $56,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREWILD — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY — $1,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel City Alliance — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA — $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds REWILD
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC
  • Who funds THE CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FUND INC
  • Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Angel City Alliance
  • Who funds Rosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oberfeld Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph