Skip to content

· Private foundation

O R ''Bub'' Hull Scholarship Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MReligion$2k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $122k
$10,134
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$19,256
UNIVERSITY OF ST MARY$18,552
BAKER UNIVERSITY$18,038
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$17,866
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA$13,650
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$12,520
STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI$11,682
PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY$10,134
NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE$8,228
MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY$7,800
MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY$7,747
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI$5,442
WHEATON COLLEGE$4,006
PERU STATE COLLEGE$3,816
METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 12%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 13%PERU STATE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $15k → 13%US TREASURY: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ST MARY: $19k → 10%BAKER UNIVERSITY: $18k → 15%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 20%WEST PLATTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $160k → 8%STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $14k → 14%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS: $12k → 15%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $46k → 17%MISSOURI WESTERN STATE: $10k → 18%NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE: $8k → 18%MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 18%WHEATON COLLEGE: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 18%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 12%PERU STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 14%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 20%WEST PLATTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $156k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $5k → 14%MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 18%ELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $7k → 7%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 12%WEST PLATTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $154k → 8%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%WEST PLATTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $147k → 8%WEST PLATTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $117k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
SD
IA
NE
MO
KS
DC
OK
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 14 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
26

Total granted

$1.2M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+11%

Still filing today

14%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    West Platte Educational Foundation
    5× · 2017–2021 · $734k · revenue -13% · 100% of their budget
  • NM
    NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $108k
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $81k

Funded once

  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +74%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
2
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
3
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
4
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
7
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Jewell College; the most unlike its peers is West Platte Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West Platte Educational Foundation: $733,841 · EducationWest Platte Educational Foundation+8 more: $104,176 · Education+8 moreNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $107,814 · OtherNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $81,129 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA: $60,454 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIAPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $29,096 · OtherPERU STATE COLLEGE: $24,804 · OtherSTATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI: $21,565 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $21,200 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $21,015 · Other+30 more: $232,166 · Other+30 more
Education$838,017Other$599,243

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWest Platte Educational Foundation: $733,841 over 5y, 100% of budgetCreighton University: $27,218 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE: $19,957 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY: $18,038 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $12,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University: $11,327 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $6,973 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $6,860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $5,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE: $5,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $4,006 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds West Platte Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE ↗
  • Who funds BAKER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds William Jewell College ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O R ''Bub'' Hull Scholarship Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O R ''Bub'' Hull Scholarship Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O R ''Bub'' Hull Scholarship Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph