Skip to content

· Public charity

NYC Kids Rise Inc

Nyc kids rise works to expand economic opportunity through a unique, community-driven college savings program in nyc.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$228kCommunity Improvement$208kRecreation & Sports$188kHuman Services$40kYouth Development$23kCivil Rights$20k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $585,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,377,663 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,792,663 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $563k
$187,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY CENTER INC$187,500
EAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC$187,500
SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$187,500
UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$7,500
THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC$7,500
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT: $10k → 13%JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT: $10k → 13%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $8k → 17%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $10k → 13%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $10k → 13%EMERALD ISLE IMMIGRATION CENTER INC: $10k → 13%EMERALD ISLE IMMIGRATION CENTER INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 6 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$495k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $208k · revenue +38%
  • SC
    SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $208k · revenue +35%
  • EI
    EMERALD ISLE IMMIGRATION CENTER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • MC
    Mercy Center Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $188k · revenue 0%
  • HS
    HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
2
Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service

Bcs partners with people to overcome obstacles on their pathway toward self-determination (see schedule o).

Human Services
3
Jewish Community Council of Greater Coney Island Inc

To provide a comprehensive range of social services to individuals and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations across nyc.

Human Services
4
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
5
Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services Inc

Catholic charities neighborhood services, inc. (ccns) is a not-for-profit corporation that provides a variety of social services throughout the boroughs of brooklyn and queens. ccns currently offers 160-plus programs and services for…

Human Services
6
Edith & Carl Marks Jewish Community House Bensonhurst Inc

The mission of the marks jch of bensonhurst, known as the jch, is to be a center for community life in brooklyn that is rooted in jewish values and fosters an inclusive environment. we affect residents at every life stage by providing…

Recreation & Sports
7
Commonpoint Ny Inc

Commonpoint is a community-centric nonprofit, serving diverse audiences though every chapter of life, across the five boroughs of new york city and beyond. they offer a rich range of services through their vast network of professionals,…

Human Services
8
East Side House Inc

East side house cares for the individuals, families, and communities we serve by expanding opportunities to live more fulfilling lives through education, career, and supportive services.

Recreation & Sports
9
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
10
Hamilton-Madison House Inc

Hamilton-madison house is a non-profit settlement house that has been the place for care and connection for the diverse populations of the lower east side since 1898. based in the lower east side but offering programming citywide, we…

Arts & Culture
11
Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York Inc

To provide social service programs for families and individuals enabling people of all ages to reach their full potential.

—
12
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is East River Development Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $207,500 · OtherSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $7,500 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $7,500 · OtherEAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $207,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE I…Mercy Center Inc: $187,500 · Recreation & SportsMercy Center IncEMERALD ISLE IMMIGRATION CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesEMERALD IS…JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT: $20,000 · Human ServicesJACOB A RI…QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesQUEENS COM…HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $7,500 · Human ServicesHENRY STRE…Make the Road New York: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$222,500Housing & Shelter$207,500Recreation & Sports$187,500Human Services$67,500Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST RIVER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $207,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $207,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMercy Center Inc: $187,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEMERALD ISLE IMMIGRATION CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMake the Road New York: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The United Neighborhood Houses of New York Inc · Mathis Pfohl Foundation · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Food Bank for New York City · The Ford Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization NYC Kids Rise Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from NYC Kids Rise Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on NYC Kids Rise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph