Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ns Goldstein Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$312kYouth Development$84kReligion$77kRecreation & Sports$75kFood & Nutrition$45kHealth$38kCrime & Legal$32kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$3,050
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN$18,808
HARRIET BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW$10,000
U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
Har Sinai - Oheb Shalom$3,050
TEMPLE BETH EL$2,540
Individual grant recipient$1,400
TEAM AMERICAN FREEDOM$500
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITTIER COLLEGE: $10k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%Har Sinai - Oheb Shalom: $8k → 11%WHITTIER COLLEGE: $5k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HARRIET BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW: $10k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HARRIET BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW: $8k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HARRIET BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW: $5k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HARRIET BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW: $5k → 14%U OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $19k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $11k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $11k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%TEMPLE EMANU EL: $7k → 17%TEMPLE EMANU EL: $6k → 17%MUSEUM OF ARTS DESIGN: $12k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $12k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $12k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $11k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $10k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $10k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $10k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $10k → 17%CITY MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITY MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITY MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITY MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 17%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $9k → 17%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $6k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $13k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $13k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $10k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $10k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$687k · 34 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
11

Total granted

$687k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+56%

Still filing today

47%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +176%
  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +35%
  • YC
    YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • WD
    WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +56%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE SERVICE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
6
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
7
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
8
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
9
Whitney Museum of American Art

The whitney museum of american art presents, collects, and inspires dialogue around art of the united states from the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. (see schedule o)we champion living artists, welcome broad audiences, and create…

Arts & Culture
10
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
11
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
12
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection and the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#15#19#13#16#20
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%12%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%58%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%63%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,734

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $77,419 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATIONMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $55,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INCYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC — $52,598 · Arts & CultureYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $52,575 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $15,600 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM+7 more — $22,700 · Arts & Culture+7 moreU OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherU OF MARYLAND PARK FOUNDATIONHAR SINAI - OHEB SHALOM CONGREGATION INC — $20,630 · OtherHAR SINAI - OHEB SHALOM CONGREGATION IN…TEMPLE BETH EL — $19,911 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELDAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH — $17,110 · OtherDAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCHCONGREGATION EMANUEL — $16,375 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANUELMUSEUM OF ARTS DESIGN — $14,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF ARTS DESIGNTEMPLE EMANU-EL — $12,640 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $10,000 · OtherLINCOLN CENTER THEATRE — $10,000 · Other+20 more — $50,860 · Other+20 moreRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $83,664 · Recreation & SportsRAMAPO FOR CH…+1 more — $450 · Recreation & SportsCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $45,000 · Food & NutritionHARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW — $32,000 · Crime & LegalWhittier College — $15,000 · EducationTEAM AMERICAN FREEDOM CORP — $500 · PhilanthropyLONGWOOD GARDENS INC — $500 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$275,892Other$246,526Recreation & Sports$84,114Food & Nutrition$45,000Crime & Legal$32,000Education$15,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $83,664 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $77,419 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC — $52,598 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $52,575 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW — $32,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $15,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWhittier College — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $6,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $3,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $3,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $2,775 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY — $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES — $375 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
  • Who funds YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds HARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM
  • Who funds Whittier College
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Frick Collection
  • Who funds New York Historical Society
  • Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE ASIA SOCIETY
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ns Goldstein Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ns Goldstein Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ns Goldstein Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph