Skip to content

· Public charity

Nourish Colorado

NOURISH COLORADO is a statewide nonprofit organization committed to strengthening connections between farms and communities so that all coloradans have equitable access to fresh, nutritious foods.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$6.6MEnvironment$191kHuman Services$85kEducation$84kHealth$48kCommunity Improvement$40kPublic Benefit$27kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 65 grants below total $1,375,520, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,559,364 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $183,844 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $155k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $679k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $542k
$12,128
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEPHANT CLOUD INC$175,010
LEEVERS SUPERMARKETS INC$145,417
DURANGO NATURAL FOOD COOPERATIVE I$117,458
SYRACUSE MARKET$54,082
BOULDER COUNTY FARMERS MARKET$50,008
OGALLALA COMMONS INC$46,667
SUNDRY DBA DECATUR FRESH LLC$41,388
CITY PARK FARMERS MARKET LLC$30,014
COLORADO AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COO$28,541
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-SPONSORED$28,297
WALSH COMMUNITY GROCERY STORE INC$25,750
COOPERATIVE MARKETS INC$25,351
AHAVAH FARM LLC$20,000
LARIMER COUNTY FARMERS MARKET$18,811
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$18,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10k → 9%PINE RIVER SHARES: $8k → 12%CORTEZ FARMERS MARKET: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 66 repeat orgs$926k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
40

Total granted

$6.5M
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
0%

Still filing today

24%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Boulder County Farmers Market
    8× · 2017–2024 · $426k · revenue +69%
  • FF
    FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $245k · revenue +8%
  • SL
    SAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $196k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHAFFEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $58k
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF MONTBELLO
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • BC
    BOULDER COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Colorado Foodshed Project

To grow colorado's food system to be more productive, accessible and secure.

Food & Nutrition
2
Northern Colorado Food Cluster

To create a healthy community through a resilient, local food system and to support and promote local food production, distribution, and consumption in northern colorado.

—
3
Ag & Food Lab

To provide equitably resource producers and other food organizations focused on food security opportunities programs and services aimed at effective stewardship of resilient food ecosystems and related charitable programs and services…

Food & Nutrition
4
UpRoot Colorado

UpRoot Colorado works to increase nutrition security in Colorado by harvesting and redistributing surplus agricultural crops while supporting the resilience of farmers and creating opportunities for volunteers to learn about and connect…

Food & Nutrition
5
Sagrada Botanical Gardens

The mission is to reconnect sustainable food and natural medicine practices to the community through the development of community land providing edible and medicinal gardens, organic farm to table food, education and regenerative land…

Environment
6
Slow Food Wind River

To build an abundant, resilient, and valued local food system that supports our landscape, our farmers, ranchers, and food artisans, and our community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
8
Josephine County Farm Collective

The Josephine County Farm Collective connects our community with access to local agricultural products and educational opportunities while strengthening the economic viability of producers.

Food & Nutrition
9
Sustainable Growers
—
10
Slow Food in the Tetons Inc

Slow food in the tetons works to grow the local and regional food economy by supporting producers, educating consumers and connecting them together in the spirit of good, clean, and fair food.

—
11
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
12
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Roots Food Project; the most unlike its peers is Peak to Peak Healthy Communities Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEEVERS SUPERMARKETS INC: $798,482 · OtherLEEVERS SUPERMARKETS INCDURANGO NATURAL FOOD COOPERATIVE I: $484,650 · OtherDURANGO NATURAL FOOD COOPERATIVE IELEPHANT CLOUD INC: $396,688 · OtherELEPHANT CLOUD INCLARIMER COUNTY CONSERVATION CORPS: $280,029 · OtherEAST DENVER FOOD HUB: $210,107 · OtherSYRACUSE MARKET: $208,109 · Other+98 more: $3,431,512 · Other+98 moreBoulder County Farmers Market: $426,236 · Food & NutritionBoulder County Farme…FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $244,900 · Food & NutritionFAIR FOOD NETWORK IN…SAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION: $196,114 · Food & NutritionSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCA…MOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT: $103,089 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD …OGALLALA COMMONS INC: $93,334 · Food & NutritionOGALLALA COMMONS INCGoFarm: $91,810 · Food & NutritionGoFarm+6 more: $170,907 · Food & Nutrition+6 moreThe Farm Collaborative: $51,608 · EducationTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $24,164 · EducationONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE: $10,595 · EducationHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER: $52,980 · EnvironmentYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Pinon Project: $8,462 · Human ServicesPine River Shares: $8,000 · Human ServicesPEAK TO PEAK HEALTHY COMMUNITIES PROJECT: $21,982 · Arts & CultureJovial Concepts: $15,649 · Crime & LegalHighwater Farm: $15,244 · Youth Development
Other$5,809,577Food & Nutrition$1,326,390Education$108,367Environment$52,980Human Services$26,462Arts & Culture$21,982Crime & Legal$15,649Youth Development$15,244

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoulder County Farmers Market: $426,236 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $244,900 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION: $196,114 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT: $103,089 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetOGALLALA COMMONS INC: $93,334 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetGoFarm: $91,810 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER: $52,980 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThe Farm Collaborative: $51,608 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetFront Line Farming: $40,739 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSPROUT CITY FARMS: $38,673 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGRICULTURE ALLIANCE INC: $34,978 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE CO: $29,569 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $24,164 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGOLDEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $23,008 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSpirit of the Sun Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOUR CORNERS FOOD COALITION: $17,948 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOLORADO FARM & FOOD ALLIANCE: $17,367 over 1y, 10% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN: $17,354 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJovial Concepts: $15,649 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHighwater Farm: $15,244 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE: $10,595 over 1y, 11% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Pinon Project: $8,462 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPine River Shares: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boulder County Farmers Market ↗
  • Who funds FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds OGALLALA COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GoFarm ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Farm Collaborative ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trailhead InstituteCO71× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trailhead Institute · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado · Kenneth Kendal King Foundation · Hunger Free Colorado · The Denver Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nourish Colorado funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nourish Colorado. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nourish Colorado’s filings →

    More from the funding graph