· Private foundation
Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of NORWIN S AND ELIZABETH N BEAN FOUNDATI’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $535k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILIES IN TRANSITION | $50,000 |
| NH HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $34,000 |
| MOORE CENTER SERVICES INC | $32,410 |
| MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $30,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF NH | $25,927 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MANCHESTER | $25,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY | $25,000 |
| 1269 CAF MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| NH LEGAL ASSISTANCE | $25,000 |
| QUEEN CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY | $25,000 |
| SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC | $22,800 |
| BREAKTHROUGH MANCHESTER | $20,000 |
| BUILDING COMMUNITY IN NH | $20,000 |
| NH MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NH; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GUGRANITE UNITED WAY5× · 2018–2023 · $189k · revenue +40%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER3× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +71%
- PTPALACE THEATRE TRUST3× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $40k
- YNYWCA NHone grant, 2017 · $30k
- MHMANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.
To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
The Granite State News Collaborative is a statewide multimedia news collaborative that draws on and amplifies the strengths of its members to expand and add missing dimensions to coverage of issues of concern to the NH public as a whole,…
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Helping individuals and families find their way to a life free of the effects of alcohol and other drugs through comprehensive treatment and recovery services open to all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits and the most unlike its peers is Bring It. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER ↗
- Who funds PALACE THEATRE TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds UPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds Manchester Neighborhood Housing Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds Amoskeag Health ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Medical Center ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY NETWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER HISTORIC ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Granite United Way · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Southern New Hampshire University · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Chill Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati?
Find your warmest path to Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.