· Private foundation
Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of NORTON & BARBARA PECK FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $8,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE THOMPSON LIBRARY | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| FRUITFUL CHERRY | $5,000 |
| AUSTIN PETS ALIVE | $5,000 |
| JOY OF LIVING ASSISTANCE DOGS | $5,000 |
| NORTH HELPLINE | $4,000 |
| RYANDA'S LEGACY FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| THE MORGAN CENTER ORLANDO | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CAT ADOPTION TEAM4× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +71%
Music Workshop2× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +656%
YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED2× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- AAALS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k
- HOHOSPICE OF SPOKANEone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
- LILOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…
To grow disciples of jesus christ by ministering to and serving those in need while sharing god's hope, faith, and love, bringing them to a place of restoration and empowering them to become productive members of our society.
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
Through superior customer service, high quality programs, and well-trained and dedicated staff, we inspire hope and lifesaving changes for people affected by substance use and mental health conditions.
Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.
Partners with young people, families and the community to break the cycle of homelessness through outreach, housing, prevention, education and employment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Low Income Housing Institute and the most unlike its peers is DVine Path Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAT ADOPTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds Music Workshop ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED ↗
- Who funds Helotes Humane Society ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds North Helpline ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds RESPONDER LIFE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION PROGRESS STUDENT ASSISTANCE FDN CAL-1 ↗
- Who funds RALEIGH PARK AFTER SCHOOL CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WORD IS BOND ↗
- Who funds LODI HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds BEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GREENBELT LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
- Who funds CODA INC COMPREHENSIVE OPTIONS FOR DRUG ABUSERS ↗
- Who funds SUN COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds CITY FRUIT ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JOYS OF LIVING ASSISTANCE DOGS ↗
- Who funds MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Deacon Charitable Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc — 59% of income from government
- Responder Life — 33% of income from government
- Greenbelt Land Trust — 31% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- With Love Oregon Inc — 16% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- Beaverton Arts Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.