Skip to content
Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$68kAnimals$45kYouth Development$36kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$35kEducation$33kReligion$31kArts & Culture$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$769k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$8,000
FRIENDS OF THE THOMPSON LIBRARY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$5,000
FRUITFUL CHERRY$5,000
JOY OF LIVING ASSISTANCE DOGS$5,000
THE MORGAN CENTER ORLANDO$4,000
NORTH HELPLINE$4,000
RYANDA'S LEGACY FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%D'VINE PATH: $3k → 11%WESTSIDE BABY: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF SPOKANE: $10k → 12%HELPING HAND OF HOPE: $3k → 13%LIBERTY HOUSE: $5k → 14%WITH LOVE OREGON: $5k → 8%KIDSPIRE: $5k → 8%TEEN REACH: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
NY
OR
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 13 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
57

Total granted

$126k
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+21%

Still filing today

62%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CAT ADOPTION TEAM
    4× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +71%
  • Music Workshop
    2× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +656%
  • YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED
    2× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF SPOKANE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • AA
    ALS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • LI
    LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
2
Sheltercare

Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

Housing & Shelter
3
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
4
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
5
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
6
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
7
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
8
Shepherd's House Ministries

To grow disciples of jesus christ by ministering to and serving those in need while sharing god's hope, faith, and love, bringing them to a place of restoration and empowering them to become productive members of our society.

Housing & Shelter
9
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
10
Lifeline Connections

Through superior customer service, high quality programs, and well-trained and dedicated staff, we inspire hope and lifesaving changes for people affected by substance use and mental health conditions.

Health
11
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
12
Cocoon House

Partners with young people, families and the community to break the cycle of homelessness through outreach, housing, prevention, education and employment.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Low Income Housing Institute; the most unlike its peers is DVine Path Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
31/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $17,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCHRYANDAS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · OtherRYANDAS LEGACY FOUNDATIONALS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $9,600 · Other+47 more: $203,580 · Other+47 moreHOSPICE OF SPOKANE: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF S…LIBERTY HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIBERTY HOUS…MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesMARY GRAHAM …WESTSIDE BABY: $5,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE BAB…KIDSPIRE: $5,000 · Human ServicesKIDSPIREWITH LOVE OREGON INC: $4,800 · Human ServicesWITH LOVE OR…TEEN REACH: $4,000 · Human ServicesTEEN REACHHELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND…DVine Path Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesDVine Path I…CAT ADOPTION TEAM: $21,000 · AnimalsCAT ADOPT…Helotes Humane Society: $8,235 · AnimalsHelotes H…AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsAUSTIN PE…YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentINSPIRE ME INC: $3,800 · Youth DevelopmentMusic Workshop: $11,500 · Arts & CultureBEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCITY FRUIT: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 · Food & NutritionHeartland Hunger & Resource Center: $2,000 · Food & NutritionLODI HOUSE: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE VILLAGE AT ORCHARD RIDGE INC: $4,800 · Housing & ShelterJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground Washington: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$254,180Human Services$44,800Animals$34,235Youth Development$20,800Arts & Culture$16,500Food & Nutrition$16,500Housing & Shelter$14,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAT ADOPTION TEAM: $21,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMusic Workshop: $11,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF SPOKANE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHelotes Humane Society: $8,235 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNorth Helpline: $7,780 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESPONDER LIFE: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOPERATION PROGRESS STUDENT ASSISTANCE FDN CAL-1: $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRALEIGH PARK AFTER SCHOOL CARE ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLIBERTY HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLODI HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOYS OF LIVING ASSISTANCE DOGS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCODA INC COMPREHENSIVE OPTIONS FOR DRUG ABUSERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTREET2FEET: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGREENBELT LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE BABY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSPIRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCITY FRUIT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGE AT ORCHARD RIDGE INC: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OF ROOTED BRILLIANCE: $4,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEEN REACH: $4,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAL-MISBAAH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY: $4,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFriends of the Kern County Library: $3,300 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDVine Path Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeartland Hunger & Resource Center: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCORVALLIS SUSTAINABILITY COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marie Lamfrom Charita…The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationSeattle FoundationMoccasin Lake Foundat…Lucky Seven FoundationUnited Way of King Co…M J Murdock Charitabl…Kawabe Memorial FundDeacon Charitable Fou…The Reser Family Foun…Maybelle Clark Macdon…
Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation TrustOR19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Deacon Charitable Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norton & Barbara Peck Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Responder Life: 33% of income from government
  • Greenbelt Land Trust: 31% of income from government
  • Liberty House: 23% of income from government
  • With Love Oregon Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Music Workshop: 10% of income from government
  • Beaverton Arts Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norton & Barbara Peck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home