Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Northwoods United Way

The NORTHWOODS UNITED WAY, inc is a locally directed organization, working to improve lives in forest, oneida, price and vilas counties by mobilizing community resources and strategically investing in human service programs.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$224kHousing & Shelter$38kFood & Nutrition$37kPhilanthropy$29kYouth Development$20kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $12,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $80,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATH - FREDRICK PLACE$6,000
TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUS$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHWOODS SHARE: $7k → 10%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $12k → 12%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $12k → 12%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUS: $11k → 12%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $11k → 12%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUS: $9k → 12%HEADWATERS INC: $9k → 12%HEADWATERS INC: $8k → 12%YMCA OF THE NORTHWOODS: $8k → 12%YMCA OF THE NORTHWOODS: $8k → 12%YMCA SAFETY AROUND WATER: $7k → 12%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUS: $6k → 12%YMCA OF THE NORTHWOODS: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$322k · 10 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$322k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+94%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +55%
  • YM
    Young Mens Christian Association of the Northwoods Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +186%
  • NA
    NORTHWOODS ALLIANCE FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $32k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $126k
  • BO
    BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +6%
  • NS
    NORTHWOODS SHARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +94%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwoods Village Inc

Creating homes by bringing safe and affordable housing opportunities to seniors and persons with disabilities in accordance with the charitable Works and traditions of the Roman Catholic Church. Works are carried out in accordance with…

2
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
3
Northwood Health Systems

To provide services to individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and or substance abuse issues.

Health
4
Northwoods Partners

To provide resources that promote independence and healthy aging.

Human Services
5
Northwoods United Way

The northwoods united way, inc is a locally directed organization, working to improve lives in forest, oneida, price and vilas counties by mobilizing community resources and strategically investing in human service programs.

Philanthropy
6
Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

Human Services
7
Barron County Developmental Services Inc

To provide person-centered services to adults based on the needs of each individual so that they are able to live their lives to the fullest. Catholic Charities Bureau Affiliates are organized to maintain, operate and conduct directly or…

8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
9
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
10
Harwood Place Inc

Harwood place, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.

Housing & Shelter
11
North Central Community Action Program Inc

The mission of NCCAP is to act as an advocate, provider, and facilitator of programs and services for low-income individuals in Lincoln, Marathon, and Wood Counties (WI). NCCAP seeks to create opportunities for people and communities to…

Community Improvement
12
Christian Community Homes and Services Inc Group Return

We are a nonprofit, faith-based organization offering senior living communities dedicated to serving individuals in ways that reflect the importance of each unique life.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Mens Christian Association of the Northwoods Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northwoods Share Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $126,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEADWATERS FOUNDATION INC — $41,000 · OtherHEADWATERS FOUNDATION INCPERSONAL ESSENTIALS PANTRY — $37,000 · OtherPERSONAL ESSENTIALS PANTRYCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN — $22,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSINCAMP FIRE USA ONEIDA COUNCIL INC — $13,000 · OtherNATH - FREDRICK PLACE — $12,000 · Other+4 more — $24,500 · Other+4 moreTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC — $72,000 · Human ServicesTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VI…Young Mens Christian Association of the Northwoods Inc — $34,500 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Christian Association …HEADWATERS INC — $29,250 · Human ServicesHEADWATERS INCNORTHWOODS SHARE INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWOODS ALLIANCE FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING INC — $32,250 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $28,748 · Philanthropy
Other$275,500Human Services$142,750Housing & Shelter$32,250Philanthropy$28,748

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC — $72,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetHEADWATERS FOUNDATION INC — $41,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of the Northwoods Inc — $34,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWOODS ALLIANCE FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING INC — $32,250 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHEADWATERS INC — $29,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $28,748 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN — $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE USA ONEIDA COUNCIL INC — $13,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWOODS SHARE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Northwoods United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph