Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Northwestern Il Area Agency on Aging

To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.

$8.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Food & Nutrition$24MHuman Services$20MCrime & Legal$764k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+5 grants · $7.0M
$236,589
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES$4,253,077
NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY$1,499,487
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF DEKALB COUNTY$516,320
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOSES OF ROCKFORD$437,725
SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER$305,618
ROCK RIVER CENTER$236,589
ELDER CARE SERVICES OF DEKALB COUNTY$220,691
WHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$219,746
LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$202,073
BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$146,882
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES$100,000
CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC$72,137
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $10.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $164k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $202k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $104k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY: $1.5M → 14%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $162k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $134k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $87k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $1.3M → 14%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $147k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $128k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $72k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY: $1.2M → 14%POLO AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $12k → 9%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $132k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $107k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $65k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $1.0M → 14%POLO AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $6k → 9%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $132k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $93k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $59k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $916k → 14%POLO AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $150 → 9%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $103k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $90k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $57k → 13%NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $909k → 14%BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $86k → 9%LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $84k → 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $45k → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $306k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $292k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $291k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $253k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $214k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $208k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $198k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45M · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$45M
$0

Still filing today

79%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $24M · revenue +29% · 64% of their budget
  • NI
    NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +50%
  • VA
    VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +13%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Seniors Assistance Center

    Seniors Assistance Center provides necessary services to senior citizens of unincorporated Norwood Park Township, and the villages of Norridge and Harwood Heights. These services include home delivered meals, information and assistance,…

    2
    Jackson County Council On Aging

    Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

    Human Services
    3
    Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

    Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

    Human Services
    4
    Kosciusko County Council On Aging and Aged Inc

    To provide services and resources to the aged citizens of kosciusko county indiana and surrounding areas including transportation, mobile meals, and senior activities to improve quality of life

    5
    West Central Illinois Aging & Disability Resource Center

    Services for the aged.

    Human Services
    6
    Perry County Council on Aging Inc

    Provide transportation and activities to the elderly

    Human Services
    7
    White County Senior Citizen

    To provide social services White and Hamilton county )IL) senior citizens. Activities are specified under Title III of the Older Americans Act. There is also a small transportation program administered by the Illinois Department of Human…

    8
    Tippecanoe County Council On Aging Inc

    Providing seniors with services and programs to promote overall wellness.

    Human Services
    9
    Senior Services Center of Will County

    To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…

    10
    Walton County Senior Citizens Council

    Aging services contractor

    Human Services
    11
    Colleton County Council On Aging

    Provide transportation, meals, activities and other services to the elderly.

    Human Services
    12
    Platte Senior Services Inc

    Provide meals,transportation and social interaction opportunities for senior citizens living in platte county missouri

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lee County Council On Aging and the most unlike its peers is Polo Area Senior Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    3
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/12
    Grantees still filing
    11/12
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $23,792,613 · Food & NutritionLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCNORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $6,910,700 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMU…Stephenson County Senior Center DBA Senior Resource Center — $1,760,901 · Human ServicesStephenson County Senior Ce…BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $925,168 · Human ServicesBOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGI…LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $837,426 · Human ServicesLEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGCarroll County Senior Services Organization Inc — $489,658 · Human Services+1 more — $18,125 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOSES OF ROCKFORD — $2,759,027 · OtherCATHOLIC CHA…WHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER — $1,275,705 · OtherWHITESIDE CO…ROCK RIVER CENTER INC — $964,671 · OtherROCK RIVER C…+1 more — $14,813 · OtherVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $3,272,759 · PhilanthropyELDER CARE SERVICES OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $1,231,690 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $764,468 · Crime & Legal
    Food & Nutrition$23,792,613Human Services$10,941,978Other$5,014,216Philanthropy$3,272,759Crime & Legal$1,996,158

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $23,792,613 over 7y, 64% of budgetNORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $6,910,700 over 6y, 18% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $3,272,759 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetStephenson County Senior Center DBA Senior Resource Center — $1,760,901 over 7y, 15% of budgetWHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER — $1,275,705 over 7y, 18% of budgetELDER CARE SERVICES OF DEKALB COUNTY INC — $1,231,690 over 7y, 16% of budgetROCK RIVER CENTER INC — $964,671 over 6y, 34% of budgetBOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $925,168 over 7y, 12% of budgetLEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $837,426 over 7y, 30% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $764,468 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCarroll County Senior Services Organization Inc — $489,658 over 7y, 11% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    • Who funds NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS
    • Who funds Stephenson County Senior Center DBA Senior Resource Center
    • Who funds WHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER
    • Who funds ELDER CARE SERVICES OF DEKALB COUNTY INC
    • Who funds ROCK RIVER CENTER INC
    • Who funds BOONE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    • Who funds LEE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    • Who funds Carroll County Senior Services Organization Inc
    • Who funds POLO AREA SENIOR SERVICES INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Foundation of Northern ILIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · United Way of Rock River Valley · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Northwestern Il Area Agency on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Northwestern Il Area Agency on Aging?

      Find your warmest path to Northwestern Il Area Agency on Aging through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph