Skip to content

· Public charity

Northern Kentucky Area Development District

Our mission is to assist the northern kentucky community in effectively entering the 21st century through the provision of high quality and technically advanced staff services to local governments, agencies, and citizens.

$35M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$15MHuman Services$9.7MFood & Nutrition$8.9MHealth$5.0MCrime & Legal$3.6MCommunity Improvement$1.8MAnimals$1.2MHousing & Shelter$926kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $5,335,020, the rows itemized in this filing. The $35,021,115 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,686,095 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.6M
$103,019
Median grant
3
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS SW OH & NKY$1,731,379
BRIGHTON CENTER$695,707
LIFE LEARNING CENTER$483,587
LIFELINE HOMECARE INC$339,704
VISITING ANGELS$313,414
ST ELIZABETH BUSINESS HEALTH$236,988
TRANSITIONS INC$156,000
ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE$143,960
LEGAL AID OF THE BLUEGRASS$137,770
R C DURR YMCA$121,726
NKY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION$118,212
NKY HEALTH DEPT$113,153
INTERIM HEALTH CARE$103,019
BAWAC INC$91,351
HELPING HANDS NKY$85,781
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $612k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $484k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $60k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $44k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
MO
KY
VA
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 70 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

70 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
65

Total granted

$45M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+33%

Still filing today

19%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $602k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEmploymentPhilanthropyAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Brighton Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +31%
  • YM
    Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +17%
  • OA
    Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $749k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • VO
    VARIOUD OTHER GRANTS 5000
    one grant, 2023 · $17M
  • KC
    KENTUCKY CAREER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $217k
  • KC
    KENTUCKY CAREER CENTER (CITY OF COV
    one grant, 2018 · $204k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
5
Owensboro Health Medical Group Inc

Owensboro health medical group, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the community.

Health
6
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership, advocacy and member services that foster growth and economic prosperity for our region.

—
7
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
8
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
9
North Fork Valley Community Health Board Inc

To provide comprehensive and affordable primary health care and related services to the residents of perry, knott, letcher, breathitt, and leslie counties and the surrounding kentucky counties.

—
10
Kentucky Senior Citizens Apartments Inc

Provide staffing and services to operate apartment complexes for senior citizens in northern kentucky.

—
11
Kentucky Bankers Association

To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…

—
12
Kentucky Health Center Network Inc

Sustains kentucky health community centers and their capacity to provide quality patient services, to institute best practices, and to pursue continuous improvement.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Cincinnati Foundation; the most unlike its peers is CCRM1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUD OTHER GRANTS 5000: $16,732,173 · OtherVARIOUD OTHER GRANTS 5000Brighton Center Inc: $11,447,472 · OtherBrighton Center IncMEALS ON WHEELS SW OH & NKY: $9,883,714 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SW OH & NKYINDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC: $3,416,840 · OtherINDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC+119 more: $18,449,147 · Other+119 moreYoung Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati: $1,035,476 · Philanthropy+2 more: $25,217 · PhilanthropyADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL: $436,128 · HealthSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $380,948 · Health+2 more: $19,246 · HealthOhio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc: $749,097 · Animals+1 more: $5,395 · AnimalsLife Learning Center Inc: $611,747 · Human ServicesNorthern Kentucky Legal Aid Society: $234,752 · Crime & LegalTRANSITIONS INCORPORATED: $156,000 · Crime & LegalGATEWAY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $251,183 · EducationTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $78,566 · Education+3 more: $26,030 · Education
Other$59,929,346Philanthropy$1,060,693Health$836,322Animals$754,492Human Services$611,747Crime & Legal$390,752Education$355,779

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrighton Center Inc: $11,447,472 over 9y, 15% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC: $3,416,840 over 7y, 21% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati: $1,035,476 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOhio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc: $749,097 over 8y, 17% of budgetLife Learning Center Inc: $611,747 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL: $436,128 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc: $385,054 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $251,183 over 7y, 12% of budgetBAWAC INC: $242,106 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Legal Aid Society: $234,752 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $198,568 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI & NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $139,939 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $78,566 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $40,833 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCCRM1: $17,352 over 2y, 14% of budgetKENTON HOUSING INC: $16,129 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATALYTIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDING CORP OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST CHARLES CARE CENTER INC: $12,348 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $11,417 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSupply Chain OKI: $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $9,313 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $7,865 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC: $6,898 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF OLDHAM COUNTY: $6,749 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Life Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADDICTION SERVICES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Northern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc ↗
  • Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAWAC INC ↗
  • Who funds Northern Kentucky Legal Aid Society ↗
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSITIONS INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Elizabeth Medical Center IncKY29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Butler Foundation · Interact for Health · The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008 · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northern Kentucky Area Development District funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northern Kentucky Area Development District. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northern Kentucky Area Development District’s filings →

    More from the funding graph