Skip to content

· Private foundation

North Pond Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2024still arriving
55
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.3MEducation$355kScience & Tech$305kCivil Rights$267kFood & Nutrition$208kArts & Culture$190kPhilanthropy$150kHuman Services$114kOther$0
02FY2024 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $115k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $390k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALMANACK ARTS COLONY$60,000
TUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST$30,000
CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE$25,000
MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION$25,000
PASCON FOUNDATION$20,000
Nantucket New School$20,000
Doctors Without Borders USA$20,000
FAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH$17,000
NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,281
Individual grant recipient$15,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$15,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$15,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE$15,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$15,000
FARMERS LEGAL ACTION GROUP$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Innocence Project: $6k → 17%The Innocence Project: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 56 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
7

Total granted

$3.0M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+250%

Still filing today

64%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureScience & TechInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $179k · revenue +10%
  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +68%
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SM
    SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • AS
    A SAFE WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR SECULAR HUMANISM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
5
New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc

The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.

—
6
Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound Inc

The alliance to protect nantucket sound is a 501(c)(3) non-profit environmental organization dedicated to the permanent preservation of nantucket sound, the historic body of water that lies between cape cod, martha's vineyard, and…

Environment
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
9
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

—
10
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
11
Northern Neck Land Conservancy

Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…

Environment
12
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Space Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Linda Loring Nature Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
34/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST INC: $854,501 · EnvironmentTUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST INCGREENPEACE FUND INC: $56,480 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $45,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · Environment+6 more: $90,358 · Environment+6 morePASCON FOUNDATION: $135,000 · OtherPASCON FOUNDATIONFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH: $117,298 · OtherFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTHCATSKILL CENTER FOR: $70,382 · OtherNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $51,000 · OtherO'Connor Hospital: $68,000 · OtherNANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $49,500 · Other+45 more: $854,705 · Other+45 moreSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $179,048 · Crime & LegalWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $107,463 · Science & TechAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $52,278 · Science & TechNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Science & TechTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $105,380 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 · InternationalRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION: $8,634 · InternationalALMANACK ARTS COLONY INC: $92,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $27,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $16,104 · Arts & CultureWSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $11,369 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $10,140 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC: $78,500 · EducationPROCTOR ACADEMY: $40,445 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGE: $15,144 · Education
Environment$1,129,339Other$1,345,885Crime & Legal$179,048Science & Tech$169,741International$159,014Arts & Culture$156,613Education$134,089

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST INC: $854,501 over 8y, 100% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $179,048 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $107,463 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $105,380 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALMANACK ARTS COLONY INC: $92,000 over 7y, 56% of budgetNANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC: $78,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetO'Connor Hospital: $68,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $56,480 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $52,278 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $51,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $49,500 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFarmers' Legal Action Group Inc: $43,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $40,445 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA SAFE PLACE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFour Winds School Inc: $38,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $34,358 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $29,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $27,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $16,104 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $15,281 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $15,144 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetM-ARK PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $11,381 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $11,369 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $10,140 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $10,140 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LINDA LORING NATURE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION: $8,634 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetNANTUCKET GARDEN CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TUCKERNUCK LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALMANACK ARTS COLONY INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds O'Connor Hospital ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Farmers' Legal Action Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Four Winds School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Gilbert Verney Foundation · The Hale Family Foundation · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Nancy Sayles Day Foundation · Clara Foundation Inc · Osceola Foundation Inc · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Pond Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Pond Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • A Safe Place Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Nantucket Community Music Center: 1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to North Pond Foundation?

Find your warmest path to North Pond Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on North Pond’s filings →

More from the funding graph