Skip to content

· Public charity

North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp

To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.

$357k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$122k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $301k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
10
’18
5
’19
11
’20
5
’21
5
’22
3
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MHousing & Shelter$778kHealth$521kArts & Culture$225kEducation$178kPhilanthropy$35kHuman Services$22kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $301,122, the rows itemized in this filing. The $357,301 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,179 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $236k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$580M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH PLATTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$121,852
NORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$113,970
PLATTE RIVER FITNESS SERIES$35,000
NEBRASKALAND DAYS INC$20,300
CREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE-ESPERANZA: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$467k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-39%
+31%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $528k
  • NP
    NORTH PLATTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $527k
  • ND
    NEBRASKALAND DAYS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTH PLATTE KIDS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +20%
  • NP
    NORTH PLATTE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
3
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska Foundation
Human Services
4
Nebraska Grazing Lands Coalition

Protect and restore ecological balance to nebraska grasslands.

Community Improvement
5
Nebraska Coalition for Patient Safety

Improve healthcare by collecting, analyzing, and sharing information about patient safety; and to ensure compliance with the patient safety improvement act.

Public Benefit
6
North Platte Area Chamber of Commerce & Developmen

The organization endeavors to serve the community and members by attracting and recruiting new businesses and jobs, devloping cultural and economic interest, and enhancing the overall business climate of the north platte, nebrask area

Community Improvement
7
Nebraska Water Environment Assn

Professional educational organization committed to public education, training and providing leadership in water quality policy development.

Environment
8
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
9
Nebraska Startup Academy

The nebraska startup academy provides guidance and mentorship to founders, investors, and the community by educating with a specialized curriculum, hosting events with industry experts, and leveraging affiliate relationships to help…

Community Improvement
10
Nebraska Hospitality Association

To promote the restaurant industry

—
11
Spencer Community Economic Development Inc

To promote economic development in Spencer, NE

Community Improvement
12
Raise the Wage Nebraska

Advocacy of policies to support Nebraskans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $527,720 · OtherNORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCENORTH PLATTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $526,500 · OtherNORTH PLATTE COMMUNITY COLLEGENORTH PLATTE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $250,000 · OtherNORTH PLATTE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYNEBRASKALAND DAYS INC: $145,450 · OtherNEBRASKALAND DAYS INCCITY OF NORTH PLATTE: $140,000 · OtherCITY OF NORTH PLATTENORTH PLATTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $121,852 · OtherNORTH PLATTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS+10 more: $89,600 · OtherMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,072,250 · PhilanthropyMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL: $80,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF LINCOLN CO INC: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthHOPE- ESPERANZA: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$1,801,122Philanthropy$1,072,250Arts & Culture$80,000Education$15,000Health$10,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,072,250 over 6y, 24% of budgetNORTH PLATTE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $250,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetNEBRASKALAND DAYS INC: $145,450 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL: $80,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetNORTH PLATTE KIDS ACADEMY: $22,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMID-PLAINS UNITED WAY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetHOPE- ESPERANZA: $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBLUEPRINT NEBRASKA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF LINCOLN CO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PLATTE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKALAND DAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PLATTE KIDS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MID-PLAINS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE- ESPERANZA ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF LINCOLN CO INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid-Nebraska Community FoundationNE32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Platte Nebraska Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph