· Public charity
North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp
To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.
Read this first · the figures below need context
78% of North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $301k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $301,122 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $357,301 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,179 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $236k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH PLATTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $121,852 |
| NORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $113,970 |
| PLATTE RIVER FITNESS SERIES | $35,000 |
| NEBRASKALAND DAYS INC | $20,300 |
| CREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NPNORTH PLATTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE5× · 2017–2022 · $528k
- NPNORTH PLATTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE3× · 2020–2024 · $527k
- NDNEBRASKALAND DAYS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- NPNORTH PLATTE KIDS ACADEMYone grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +20%
- NPNORTH PLATTE CATHOLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $10k
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protect and restore ecological balance to nebraska grasslands.
Improve healthcare by collecting, analyzing, and sharing information about patient safety; and to ensure compliance with the patient safety improvement act.
The organization endeavors to serve the community and members by attracting and recruiting new businesses and jobs, devloping cultural and economic interest, and enhancing the overall business climate of the north platte, nebrask area
Professional educational organization committed to public education, training and providing leadership in water quality policy development.
The nebraska startup academy provides guidance and mentorship to founders, investors, and the community by educating with a specialized curriculum, hosting events with industry experts, and leveraging affiliate relationships to help…
To promote the restaurant industry
To promote economic development in Spencer, NE
Advocacy of policies to support Nebraskans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH PLATTE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKALAND DAYS INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVITY UNLIMITED ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NORTH PLATTE KIDS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds MID-PLAINS UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC ↗
- Who funds HOPE- ESPERANZA ↗
- Who funds BLUEPRINT NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF LINCOLN CO INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mid-Nebraska Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.