Skip to content
North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc

The mission of the north carolina housing coalition is to lead a movement to ensure that every north carolinian has a home in which to live with dignity and opportunity.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.3MHuman Services$1.3MCommunity Improvement$737kEnvironment$464kHealth$92kCivil Rights$50kPublic Benefit$39k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $928,354, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,852,954 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $924,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $614k
$35,990
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROSPERITY UNLIMITED INC$165,191
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF GREEN$106,597
REINVESTMENT PARTNERS$99,269
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE$82,073
HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP$56,100
CLEVELAND COUNTY CDC$53,024
OLIVE HILL COOM ECONOMIC DEV CORP$51,888
HOME SOLUTIONS OF DAVIDSON COUNTY$48,044
KINGDOM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$44,939
WILSON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSN$35,990
CHOANOKE AREA DEV ASSN OF NC$31,642
FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT$29,380
EMPOWERMENT INC$27,801
NC CHILD$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS$24,471
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ON TRACK FINANCIAL EDUCATION & COUN: $93k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $54k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $101k → 15%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE: $82k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $37k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $65k → 15%ON TRACK FINANCIAL EDUCATION & COUN: $81k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $28k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $62k → 15%ON TRACK FINANCIAL EDUCATION & COUN: $58k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $27k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $52k → 15%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $63k → 16%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE: $56k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $26k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $47k → 15%ON TRACK FINANCIAL EDUCATION & COUN: $51k → 12%EMPOWERMENT INC: $21k → 13%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $46k → 15%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF GREEN: $62k → 16%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE: $43k → 12%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $29k → 15%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $56k → 16%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE: $36k → 12%FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $28k → 15%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $51k → 16%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE: $25k → 12%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $50k → 16%ON TRACK FINANCIAL EDUCATION & COUN: $15k → 12%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $37k → 16%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $36k → 16%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $36k → 16%HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 24 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$6.7M
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-11%

Still filing today

88%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    Prosperity Unlimited Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $915k · revenue +3% · 34% of their budget
  • Reinvestment Partners
    8× · 2017–2024 · $645k · revenue +750%
  • CC
    Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $541k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $62k · revenue +1%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTEDGECOMBE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • HC
    Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Mountain Housing Opportunities Inc

To provide affordable housing for low-income individuals living in buncombe county and the surrounding areas of north carolina.

Housing & Shelter
3
Housing Collaborative

Housing Collaborative makes affordable housing easier to navigate by helping to secure rental housing for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness; and for those who have lost housing due to disaster or displacement. We make it easier…

Housing & Shelter
4
Holston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Holston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
Home Alliance Inc

To develop affordable housing for low-income and homeless persons and families in horry and georgetown counties.

Housing & Shelter
6
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity of Burke County Inc

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with gods people in need by building houses, so that there are decent homes in decent communities in whigh gods people…

Housing & Shelter
8
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
9
Martindale Brightwood Community Development Center

Continue to provide programs that assist low income families with purchasing & rehabilitation of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
Open Door Counseling Center

Open Door Counseling Center is a HUD Certified Comprehensive Housing Counseling Agency to educate and assist underserved households to obtain and retain affordable permanent housing; provide immediate basic human needs for community…

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of Alamance Co

Habitat for Humanity of Alamance County envisions a world where everyone in our community has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of Alamance County is a non profit organization seeking to put Gods love into action by building…

Housing & Shelter
12
Housing Development Corporation of Rock Hill

The organization helps low and moderate income persons become homeowners by buying homes, selling them to income-qualified buyers and reusing sales proceeds to build more homes. the organization also conducts pre-purchase financial…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Housing Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is River City Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Prosperity Unlimited Inc: $914,861 · Housing & ShelterProsperity Unlimited IncCleveland County Community Development Corp Inc: $411,605 · Housing & ShelterCleveland County Community Development Corp IncGREENVILLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $335,149 · Housing & ShelterGREENVILLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPKingdom Community Development Corporation: $316,069 · Housing & ShelterKingdom Community Development CorporationOlive Hill Community Economic Development Corporation: $308,392 · Housing & ShelterOlive Hill Community Economic Development CorporationHome Solutions of Davidson County NC Inc: $306,269 · Housing & ShelterHome Solutions of Davidson County NC IncCHOANOKE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $217,512 · Housing & ShelterCHOANOKE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLIN…MONROE-UNION COUNTY COMMUNITY: $212,667 · Housing & ShelterMONROE-UNION COUNTY COMMUNITYRiver City Community Development Corporation: $128,405 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Foundation CDC Inc: $125,874 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $57,592 · Housing & ShelterConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc: $540,772 · Human ServicesConsumer Credit Counselin…FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $429,747 · Human ServicesFINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE…HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $358,790 · Human ServicesHOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUPEMPOWERMENT INC: $192,376 · Human ServicesEMPOWERMENT INCFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $61,802 · Human ServicesCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING OF GREEN: $427,318 · OtherCONSUMER CREDIT COU…GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC: $211,041 · OtherGREENSBORO HOUSING …WILSON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $193,824 · OtherWILSON COMMUNITY IM…JOHNSTON LEE HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTI: $92,302 · OtherJOHNSTON LEE HARNET…NC CHILD: $50,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTEDGECOMBE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $45,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $40,000 · OtherCITY OF WILMINGTON NC: $39,215 · Other+4 more: $76,008 · Other+4 moreReinvestment Partners: $645,453 · Community ImprovementReinvestment…BRICK CAPITAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $114,211 · Community ImprovementBRICK CAPITA…GROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK: $112,258 · Health
Housing & Shelter$3,334,395Human Services$1,583,487Other$1,174,708Community Improvement$759,664Health$112,258

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProsperity Unlimited Inc: $914,861 over 8y, 34% of budgetReinvestment Partners: $645,453 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc: $540,772 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetFINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT: $429,747 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCleveland County Community Development Corp Inc: $411,605 over 8y, 21% of budgetHOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP: $358,790 over 8y, 11% of budgetGREENVILLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $335,149 over 7y, 15% of budgetKingdom Community Development Corporation: $316,069 over 8y, 14% of budgetOlive Hill Community Economic Development Corporation: $308,392 over 7y, 99% of budgetHome Solutions of Davidson County NC Inc: $306,269 over 8y, 15% of budgetCHOANOKE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $217,512 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMONROE-UNION COUNTY COMMUNITY: $212,667 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC: $211,041 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetWILSON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $193,824 over 8y, 10% of budgetEMPOWERMENT INC: $192,376 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetRiver City Community Development Corporation: $128,405 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCommunity Foundation CDC Inc: $125,874 over 8y, 38% of budgetBRICK CAPITAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $114,211 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetGROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK: $112,258 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $61,802 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWhite Oak Foundation Inc: $57,592 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetNC CHILD: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTEDGECOMBE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $45,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Prosperity Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Reinvestment Partners ↗
  • Who funds Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds FINANCIAL PATHWAYS OF THE PIEDMONT ↗
  • Who funds Cleveland County Community Development Corp Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING CONSULTANTS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Kingdom Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Olive Hill Community Economic Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Home Solutions of Davidson County NC Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHOANOKE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE-UNION COUNTY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds River City Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation CDC Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRICK CAPITAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds White Oak Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NC CHILD ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTEDGECOMBE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carolinas Credit Unio…Triangle Community Fo…Wells Fargo FoundationZ Smith Reynolds Foun…North Carolina Commun…Dogwood Health TrustThe Golden Leaf IncDuke Energy FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Carolinas Credit Union FoundationSC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carolinas Credit Union Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · The Golden Leaf Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Carolina Housing Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home