Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

North American Communities Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$202kEducation$100kReligion$57kPhilanthropy$47kInternational$33kYouth Development$21kMembership Benefit$15kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $76k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$45,690
HEARTS FOR MISSION$30,490
TRURO NEWS$4,000
GREATER TAMPA BAY BOY SCOUTS$1,000
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BUDGET BUDDIES: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$384k · 10 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
26

Total granted

$384k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+20%

Still filing today

40%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $202k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $47k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • AF
    AAA-CPA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • UP
    UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
3
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
4
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
10
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
11
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
12
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Twelfth Step Ministry Inc and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $201,940 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS — $46,756 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAHEARTS FOR MISSION — $30,490 · OtherHEARTS FOR MISSIONIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherAGE ADVANCING GIRLS EDUCATION — $19,889 · OtherAAA-CPA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+20 more — $64,930 · Other+20 moreFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $20,529 · EducationFLORIDA SO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationHILLSDALE …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…The Kinkaid School Inc — $5,231 · EducationThe Kinkai…TRURO NEWS INC % BRIAN BOYLE — $4,000 · EducationTRURO NEWS…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation — $30,000 · InternationalBOOKS FOR DEVELOPMENT — $3,120 · InternationalTRURO ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC % JOANNE HOLLANDER — $10,000 · EnvironmentMeals on Wheels of Tampa Inc — $3,000 · Food & NutritionADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $1,250 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $100 · Human ServicesEVETT SIMMONS FOUNDATION INC — $100 · Public Benefit
Other$439,005Education$50,760International$33,120Environment$10,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Arts & Culture$1,250Human Services$100Public Benefit$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $20,529 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRURO ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC % JOANNE HOLLANDER — $10,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc — $5,231 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $5,180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRURO NEWS INC % BRIAN BOYLE — $4,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetBOOKS FOR DEVELOPMENT — $3,120 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Tampa Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds African Mission Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRURO ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INC % JOANNE HOLLANDER
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds TRURO NEWS INC % BRIAN BOYLE
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Tampa Inc
  • Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University
  • Who funds LEARN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BUTTS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC
  • Who funds EVETT SIMMONS FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization North American Communities Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Women's Money Matters Inc1% of income from government
  • Florida Southern College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to North American Communities Foundation?

Find your warmest path to North American Communities Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph