· Private foundation
Normandie Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $651k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOBER TODAY CLUB | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS | $55,000 |
| TIDES CENTER-DETROIT ACTION EDUCATION FUND | $35,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION-BLOC EDUCATION FUND | $35,000 |
| AWOOD CENTER | $35,000 |
| NORTH AMERICAN MARINE ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| HIGHER HEIGHTS LEADERSHIP FUND | $30,000 |
| CATA-COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS | $30,000 |
| JOLT INITIATIVE | $30,000 |
| MOTHERING JUSTICE | $30,000 |
| GROUND GAME FUND | $30,000 |
| BREACH COLLECTIVE | $30,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $30,000 |
| SOMOS SIEMBRA | $30,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $313k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSOBER TODAY CLUB INC3× · 2022–2024 · $275k · revenue +11% · 61% of their budget
- CFCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS3× · 2022–2024 · $105k · revenue +1%
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- NGNew Georgia Projectone grant, 2020 · $40k
- GSGEORGIA STAND UPone grant, 2023 · $30k
- SCSUNFLOWER COMMUNITY ACTION INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.
Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.
The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Earthworks is dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the impacts of irresponsible mineral and energy development while seeking…
The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.
International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Falmouth Bikeways Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOBER TODAY CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds JOLT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Higher Heights Leadership Fund ↗
- Who funds BREACH COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Environmental Law Institute ↗
- Who funds Government Accountability Project ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN MARINE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AWOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ground Game Fund ↗
- Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds SOMOS SIEMBRA ↗
- Who funds URBAN REVIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Norman Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Windward Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Overbrook Foundation · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Normandie Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc — 100% of income from government
- Buzzards Bay Coalition — 37% of income from government
- Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Normandie Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Normandie Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.