Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Federation Of San Francisco The Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
7
18
8
19
8
20
4
21
4
22
2
23
1
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of NORMAN & MARCIA BURNAM FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$12,500
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$10,000
CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER$10,000
SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL$5,000
NORTH BAY AQUATICS$2,500
TREE PEOPLE$2,500
GOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR$1,000
MITCHELL COLLEGE$1,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%LOWEN SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 7%GOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR: $1k → 10%UNIV SAN FRANCISCO INST FOR NONVIOLENCE: $500 → 10%SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $5k → 12%UCLA FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%MITCHELL COLLEGE: $25k → 9%WESTMINISTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 7%GOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR: $1k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $3k → 10%SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $3k → 12%POMONA COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $250 → 14%MITCHELL COLLEGE: $10k → 9%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 7%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $100k → 10%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $55k → 10%SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $1k → 12%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $13k → 14%MITCHELL COLLEGE: $1k → 9%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 7%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $100k → 10%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $50k → 10%SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $250 → 12%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $1k → 14%MITCHELL COLLEGE: $1k → 9%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $97k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $250 → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $75k → 10%ST STEPHENS CHURCH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $40k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIB: $30k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $10k → 10%STERNE SCHOOL: $2k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $10k → 10%STERNE SCHOOL: $1k → 10%UNITED WAY: $1k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $13k → 10%COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $5k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SF: $10k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SF: $360 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$648k · 11 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$648k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+140%

Still filing today

82%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Crowden Music Center
    7× · 2018–2024 · $432k · revenue +6%
  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $105k · revenue +0%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LOWEN SOCCER CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +140%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -16%
  • WF
    WESTMINISTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

3
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
6
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
7
Menlo School

Menlo school's mission is to empower students to explore and expand their interests, reach their fullest potential, develop the skills necessary for success in college, and become ethical, responsible, and engaged members of ever wider…

8
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
12
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Catalina School and the most unlike its peers is The Lowen Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Crowden Music Center — $432,132 · OtherThe Crowden Music CenterFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIB — $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIB+7 more — $32,250 · Other+7 moreJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $105,000 · ReligionJEWISH LEARNINGW…MITCHELL COLLEGE — $37,000 · EducationMITCHELL COL…Trustees of Tufts College — $20,000 · EducationTrustees of …SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL — $8,750 · EducationSANTA CATALI…Wellesley College — $8,000 · EducationWellesley Co…+2 more — $2,600 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $10,360 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOWEN SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH BAY AQUATICS — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $250 · Arts & CultureTREEPEOPLE INC — $2,500 · Environment
Other$494,382Religion$105,000Education$76,350Philanthropy$11,360Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$7,250Environment$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Crowden Music Center — $432,132 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $105,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMITCHELL COLLEGE — $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $10,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL — $8,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOWEN SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNORTH BAY AQUATICS — $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTERNE SCHOOL — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Mitchell College2% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Norman & Marcia Burnam Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph