Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norkaitis Family Charities Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$856kReligion$274kInternational$173kEducation$111kHuman Services$93kRecreation & Sports$23kEmployment$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$30,000
TMC FOUNDATION$15,000
BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATIONS$15,000
ST PIUS ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH$15,000
SAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SHOULDER TO SHOULDER FOUNDATION$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE IA$7,000
DES MOINES CATHOLIC WORKER HOUSE$5,000
CASA MARIA$5,000
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC WDM$4,000
DMACC FOUNDATION$4,000
THE BRIDGE CHURCH$4,000
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$4,000
CATHOLIC TUITION SUPPORT ORGANIZATION$3,062
WDM SOCIAL SERVICES$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHOULDER TO SHOULDER FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%UNBOUND: $3k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC: $1k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $18k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IA
NE
AZ
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$1.6M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+56%

Still filing today

29%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Banner Health Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +42%
  • DF
    DMACC FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +186%
  • AH
    ANAWIM HOUSING INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UH
    UKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +268% · 47% of their budget
  • UT
    UKRAINE TRUSTCHAIN
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -10%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
Des Moines University Osteopathic Medical Center

To improve lives in our global community by educating diverse groups of highly competent and compassionate health professionals.

Education
7
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shoulder to Shoulder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCY FOUNDATION: $765,518 · OtherMERCY FOUNDATIONSACRED HEART CATHOLIC WDM: $135,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHOLIC WDMIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PIUS ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH: $73,100 · OtherTMC FOUNDATION: $68,000 · Other+25 more: $271,412 · Other+25 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…UKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · InternationalUKRAINE HO…UKRAINE TRUSTCHAIN: $30,000 · InternationalUKRAINE TR…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STA…Banner Health Foundation: $80,000 · HealthDMACC FOUNDATION: $66,000 · EducationCreighton University: $3,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 · Human ServicesUnbound: $12,800 · Human ServicesSHOULDER TO SHOULDER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS: $9,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Food Bank Inc: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,388,030International$160,000Health$80,000Education$69,000Human Services$41,800Community Improvement$9,000Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBanner Health Foundation: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION: $66,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetUKRAINE TRUSTCHAIN: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANAWIM HOUSING INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnbound: $12,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DMACC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE TRUSTCHAIN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ANAWIM HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SHOULDER TO SHOULDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norkaitis Family Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norkaitis Family Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Norkaitis Family Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Norkaitis Family Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norkaitis Family Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph