Skip to content

· Private foundation

Noren Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$468kHealth$407kHousing & Shelter$214kHuman Services$205kEducation$190kAnimals$110kArts & Culture$100kInternational$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
J ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$50,000
PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FNDN INC$40,000
DOGS INC$25,000
FEAST INC$25,000
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC$25,000
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF$25,000
FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC$20,000
DE LA SALLE ACADEMY$20,000
VALERIES HOUSE INC$20,000
ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $364k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $25k → 10%VALERIES HOUSE INC: $20k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $34k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $25k → 10%VALERIES HOUSE INC: $20k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 13%DOGS INC: $25k → 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS INC: $20k → 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 13%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $10k → 12%SAMARAS VILLAGE: $10k → 9%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $10k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $10k → 12%ST JAMES NEST INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+20%

Still filing today

68%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FEAST Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +264%
  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $144k · revenue +38%
  • PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • CF
    COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • LO
    LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coastal Harvest

Feed the hungry and assist our partner agencies free of charge.

Human Services
2
Good Samaritan Health Centers Inc

To ensure free access to high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the lives of uninsured adult residents in St. Johns County, Florida.

Health
3
Mother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc

Mother Hubbard's Cupboard serves the hungry in the Wilmington area through distribution of emergency food. This service is provided without discrimination by volunteers in collarboration with community organizations and businesses with…

—
4
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding the Gulf Coast

The Organization is a tax-exempt food distribution center committed to providing nutritionally balanced food for hungry people in 24 counties in Alabama, Florida and Mississippi.

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding Dreams Inc

The mission of Feeding Dreams to combat childhood hunger and malnutrition that affect one in five children in Florida. Through grants, fundraising efforts, and school partnerships, we delivered 2.5 million highly nutritious meals to…

Food & Nutrition
7
St Francis House

Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.

Housing & Shelter
8
South County Food Pantry Inc

Hunger relief for the indigent. The South County Food Pantry provides food to families and individuals in the Venice, Nokomis, Laurel & Osprey, areas of FL. SCFP distributes to more than 400 family units per month.

Food & Nutrition
9
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc

Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…

Food & Nutrition
10
St Peters Kitchen Inc

"To create a warm welcoming community that goes beyond providing immediate nourishment, by empowering our guests with hope and a pathway to a healthy and safe future."

Food & Nutrition
11
Brunswick Food Pantry Inc

Providing food to the food insecure.

Human Services
12
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is St James Nest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

J ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $175,000 · OtherJ ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL HOSPITALMORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH: $115,000 · OtherMORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTHJ ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL: $100,000 · OtherJ ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIALHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF: $100,000 · OtherHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OFBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $80,000 · OtherBrunswick Family Assistance Agency IncHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SW: $60,000 · OtherHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SWHope Harbor Home Inc: $30,000 · OtherSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $60,000 · Other+5 moreMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $143,500 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES…Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: $135,000 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Guide Dogs…VALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesVALERIE'S HOUSE INCWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesPINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · EducationPINELLAS CO…COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $25,000 · EducationCOOPERATIVE…LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationLACES OF LO…FEAST Inc: $180,000 · PhilanthropyFEAST IncFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $112,500 · Food & NutritionMATTHEWS MINISTRY INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $62,000 · HealthMercy Ships International: $40,000 · International
Other$745,000Human Services$363,500Education$185,000Philanthropy$180,000Food & Nutrition$127,500Housing & Shelter$70,000Health$62,000International$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEAST Inc: $180,000 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $143,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $112,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $62,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMercy Ships International: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHope Harbor Home Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMATTHEWS MINISTRY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSAMARA'S VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBrunswick Community College Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEAST Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds VALERIE'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hope Harbor Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds LACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEWS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Brunswick Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES NEST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noren Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noren Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Valerie's House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noren’s filings →

More from the funding graph