Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norelli Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$547k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$3.4MHealth$3.2MEducation$1.2MReligion$259kRecreation & Sports$255kHuman Services$106kCommunity Improvement$98kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOLID ROCK$547,200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$510,900
Individual grant recipient$150,000
Individual grant recipient$139,500
ADVENTHEALTH$110,000
SASCF$50,000
CHURCH OF NATIVITY$50,000
MADHATTER CYCLING INC$35,000
INTERNATIONAL VOLLEYBALL HALL OF F$25,500
HERKIMER 9 FOUNDATION$16,000
VIOLECTRIC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE: $40k → 11%KIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE: $34k → 11%FAINE HOUSE: $50 → 13%KIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE: $32k → 11%KIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE: $360 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 24 repeat orgs$639k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$9.7M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+8%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $551k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +81%
  • TM
    THE MUSICIANS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $343k · revenue +32%
  • FC
    FLAGLER COLLEGE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $204k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Ryan's Case for Smiles

Ryan's case for smiles helps with the stress and emotional impact of illness in the here and now. our whimsical pillowcases give children an emotional boost, while our copingspace and justsibs resources and tools help families better…

Human Services
4
Austin Wade Foundation

Children battling cancer

Unclassified
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Kids Beating Cancer Inc

Organization - kids beating cancer, inc., (kbc) is a nonprofit, nonstock florida corporation formed in 1992. kbc provides access to life-saving treatments through the science of cellular therapy and advancing pediatric innovative, novel,…

Human Services
7
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
8
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
9
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
10
Jamies Run Inc

Jamie's Run honors the short life of Jamie Lynne Knotts who died in 2010 of a rare liver cancer at 5 1/2 months old. The annual event raises money for the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders at Connecticut Children's, to fund the search…

Health
11
Levi Legacy

At levis legacy, our mission is clear to serve and support families facing the daunting reality of chds, along with the dedicated medical professionals who stand by their side. our mission is not just to weather the storm with them but to…

Youth Development
12
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hope for Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is MadHatter Cycling. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOLID ROCK: $3,022,575 · OtherSOLID ROCKALSAC ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $2,399,070 · OtherALSAC ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHIndividual grant recipient: $970,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $510,900 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHIndividual grant recipient: $450,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+34 more: $1,028,626 · Other+34 moreHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UN…FLAGLER COLLEGE INC: $204,281 · EducationFLAGLER COLLE…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE MUSICIANS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM: $342,501 · Arts & CultureMadHatter Cycling: $115,000 · Recreation & SportsKIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE INC: $105,803 · Human ServicesTHE LIFEBOAT PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesCOLTON SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $32,000 · Health+1 more: $1,700 · HealthHERKIMER 9 FOUNDATION INC: $98,000 · Community Improvement
Other$8,381,671Education$1,209,281Arts & Culture$342,501Recreation & Sports$115,000Human Services$110,853Health$103,700Community Improvement$98,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSICIANS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM: $342,501 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetFLAGLER COLLEGE INC: $204,281 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMadHatter Cycling: $115,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetKIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE INC: $105,803 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetHERKIMER 9 FOUNDATION INC: $98,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetCOLTON SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 5y, 49% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREINHARDT UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFEBOAT PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAINE HOUSE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSICIANS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FLAGLER COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MadHatter Cycling ↗
  • Who funds KIDS HOUSE OF SEMINOLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HERKIMER 9 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLTON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REINHARDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FLIGHT 25 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIFEBOAT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BASE CAMP CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norelli Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norelli Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Kids House of Seminole Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Faine House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norelli Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Norelli Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norelli Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph