Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nordlys Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$740k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MArts & Culture$942kEducation$485kYouth Development$163kHuman Services$141kFood & Nutrition$95kCommunity Improvement$94kHealth$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADIRONDACK COUNCIL$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
Individual grant recipient$44,547
SARATOGA PLAN$35,000
AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE$25,000
THE NATIONAL HERITAGE TRUST$25,000
SARATOGA SENIOR CENTER$25,000
CAFFE LENA$20,000
SARATOGA INSTITUTE$20,000
AGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN$20,000
SAGAMORE INSTITUTE OF THE ADIRONDAC$15,000
AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $11k → 11%COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $11k → 11%COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%WELLSPRING: $15k → 7%WELLSPRING: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 34 repeat orgs$890k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
25

Total granted

$3.7M
$755k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-3%

Still filing today

59%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $555k · revenue +74%
  • NH
    NORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $380k · revenue +57%
  • SP
    SARATOGA PLAN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • AL
    ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue -51%
  • SP
    SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
2
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
3
Protect the Adirondacks Inc

Protect is a grassroots, membership organization dedicated to the protection, stewardship and sustainability of the natural environment and human communities of the adirondack park and the new york state forest preserve for current and…

Environment
4
Catskill Center for Conservation & Development Inc

The Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Inc. (the Catskill Center) is a not-for-profit organization under the non-profit laws of the State of New York. The mission of the Catskill Center is to preserve and enrich the…

Environment
5
Adirondack North Country Association Inc

Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties

Food & Nutrition
6
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
7
Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation Inc

The saratoga springs preservation foundation promotes the preservation and enhancement of the architectural, cultural, and landscaped heritage of saratoga springs through educational programs, advocacy, technical assistance and restoration.

—
8
Scenic Hudson Inc

Scenic Hudson was founded in 1963 when six community members came together to stop a massive power plant from defacing the iconic Storm King Mountain. (Please see Schedule O explaination for further context of Organization's mission…

Environment
9
Lake George Land Conservancy Inc

Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.

Environment
10
Sustainable Hudson Valley Inc

Sustainable hudson valley's mission is to speed up, scale up, jazz up, and leverage progress against climate change, creating communities where people and nature thrive.

Environment
11
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
12
Mountain Top Arboretum Inc

Conserve, enhance, and celebrate our distinctive catskill sanctuary through sustainable horticulture, responsible land stewardship, and innovative educational programming

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saratoga Plan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catie Hoch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
19/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $553,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $281,547 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAGAMORE INSTITUTE OF THE ADIRONDAC: $190,000 · OtherSAGAMORE INSTITUTE OF THE ADIRONDACAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $125,000 · OtherAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · Other+36 more: $596,255 · Other+36 moreADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $400,000 · EnvironmentADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INCTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $375,000 · EnvironmentTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INCSARATOGA PLAN INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentSARATOGA PLAN INCAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC: $95,000 · EnvironmentAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP AS…LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $66,500 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC+2 more: $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $555,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SWEDIS…SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureSARATOGA PERFORMING…CAFFE LENA INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureCAFFE LENA INCLAKE GEORGE OPERA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $28,045 · Arts & CultureNORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $380,000 · EducationNORTH HOUSE…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …STOMPING GROUND CAMP INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAY ADK INC: $10,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVE: $22,500 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSARATOGA INSTITUTE INC: $94,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,815,802Environment$1,111,500Arts & Culture$798,045Education$480,000Youth Development$162,000Human Services$127,500Community Improvement$94,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $555,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC: $400,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetNORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $380,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $375,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSTOMPING GROUND CAMP INC: $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSARATOGA PLAN INC: $150,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC: $95,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSARATOGA INSTITUTE INC: $94,000 over 4y, 42% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCAFFE LENA INC: $75,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $66,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE GEORGE OPERA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetNATURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOONCATCHER PROJECT INC: $32,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC: $27,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHUDSON CROSSING PARK INC: $25,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $22,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC: $15,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetARTS CENTER AND THEATRE OF SCHENECTADY INC: $11,295 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOBRO CONSERVANCY OF SARATOGA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetPLAY ADK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSHELTERS OF SARATOGA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSARATOGA COUNTY HISTORY CENTER: $6,250 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetHUDSON HEADWATERS HEALTH NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION HALL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASY WATER FOR EVERYONE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE PULSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDSON YOUTH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH FX INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds STOMPING GROUND CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA PLAN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAFFE LENA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE GEORGE OPERA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE MOONCATCHER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON CROSSING PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER AND THEATRE OF SCHENECTADY INC ↗
  • Who funds St Williams on Long Point Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY39.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Adirondack Trust Company Community Fund · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · Jane N Mooty Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · The Swyer Family Foundation Inc · Keeler Motor Car Company Charitable Foundation · Alfred Z Solomon Testamentary Trust · The Mitzen Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nordlys Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nordlys Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Berkshire Pulse Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nordlys Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nordlys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nordlys’ filings →

More from the funding graph